Saturday 29 October 2016

PIL Writ Petition drafted by Sukriti Ranjan Biswas.

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                                   CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                                                                                      IN
                                       WRIT  PETITION   NO.                               OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF :
1        Solidarity committee for Bengali Refugees                                    Petitioners                                                                                                             
                    907, Soondarhi Station Road, Pilibhit
Dist. : Pilibhit
Uttar Pradesh,   Pin Code : 262001
2    Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam ( CRPC )
       ( Regn. No. 2729/1995-96 )
       House No. – 42, Beltala  P.O. – Khanapara Road
       Guwahati – 781
3     All India Namasudra Kalyan Parisad
Shanti Nagar, P.O. – Palta, Dist. – North 24 Parganas
Kolkata – 700…………
4    Nityananda Mallick, Practicing Advocate
S/O Late Raj Kumar Mallick
Maharajpur, P.O.- Gobiasarai
Dist. Pilibhit,UP. Pin - 262122

                                     VERSUS
           
            1   The Union of India and others.                                                                Respondents
                                                                          WITH
                                     I.A   no.         of 2015,   An application for ex-parte Stay
                                                                  PAPER BOOK                 
                                                      (For Index, Kindly See Inside)
                              
                                                                 Dr. Kailash Chand
                                                     ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS

                             
                                  INDEX  OF  RECORDS  OF  PROCEDINGS

Sl. No.         Date of Record of Proceding                   Remarks.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

                                                           



                                                                INDEX
              Sl.No.        PARTICULARS                                       PAGES
1              Listing Pro forma ……………………… …   A1 – A5

2              Synopsis and List of Dates  …………………..   B – O

3          Writ Petition with Affidavit  …………………  1 – 83

4                   Annexure --- P /1    ……………………………    84
            Questions of the various Members in the
Parliament In regard to religious persecution
 of the Minorities of Bangladesh and the
 answers of the Ministers during the period
 from 2001 to 2011.
           
5       Annexure --- P/2 ,  ………………………………97     
Definition of the term Refugee formulated by
 United Nations and some other relevant general
provisions of the declaration of UNO.
             
6       Annexure --P/3   ………………………………. 101  
          Introductory Note by the office of the United
 Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)

                   7       Annexure---P/4   ……………………………….105 
                   Copy of the order of the Odisha Govt. No. PPT(P)
60/2000-15681 dated the 16th March, 2001.
                       
8       Annexure ----P / 5  …………………………………….108
Copy of the order of the Ministry of Home Affairs
No. F-14011/55/09-F.VI dated the 23rd November, 2009.

9        I. A. No. ………….. /2015   ……………………….119    
An application for interim order of Stay        




                         

                                  




                                
                                   PROFORMA  FOR  FIRST  LISTING
                               In the Supreme Court of India

1        Nature of the matter                                   Writ Petition (Civil) under Article 32
2        Name(s) of the Petitioner(s) /Appellants : Solidarity Committee for 
                                                                              Bengali Refugees And Others
                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                                                3        Email Id no. of the petitioners                    Not Available
4        Name of the Respondents                          Union of India & others.
5        No. of the Case                                  Writ Petition (civil)………. Of 2015
6        Advocate for Petitioners                                       Dr. Kailash Chand.
6A     Email Id of the Advocate                   NA
7        Advocate for Respondents                         NA
8        Section dealing with the matter                   XX
9        Date of Impugned order                            NA
10      Names of Hon’ble Judges                    NA
11      In land acquisition matters                         NA
11A   Notification/Govt. Order
 No.(u/s 4,6), Dated issued                         NA
 By centre/state of                               NA
11B   Exact purpose of
acquisitioned village involved                              NA       
12      In civil matter                                                       NA
12A   Suit no. Name of lower court                               NA
 12B  Date of judgment                                                 NA
13      In Writ Petition : ‘Catchword’ of
            Other similar matters                                                  Migrants of Pakistan
                                                                                       & Bangladesh.
14      In case of motor vehicle accident
            Matters : vehicle number                                    NA
15      In service matters                                                  NA
          I) Relevant service rules, if any                                      NA
          ii) ID Reference /Award no. if applicable             NA
16      Nature of Urgency                                                         NA
17      In case it is a tax matter                                                 NA
          i) Tax amount involved in the matter                            NA
          ii) Whether a reference/statement of
              the case was called for or rejected                              NA
            iii) Whether similar tax matter of same
               Parties filed earlier (may be for earlier
               /other assessment year)                                   NA
            iv) Exemption notification/ circular no.                       NA
19.     Valuation of the matter                                                  NA
20      Classification of the matter (please fill up
          The number & name of relevant category
          With subcategory as per the list circulated.                   NA
21.     Title of the Act. involved (Centre/State)                        Constitution of India.
21A   Sub classification Indicate
section/Article of the Statute.                               14,21,20(1),22(4),
Citizenship Act.1955                                              
21B   Sub section involved                                                       5(1)(a), 3(1)(b),
3(1)(c), 2(1)(b), 6A
 21C  Title of the rules involve
             (centre/state                                                      Citizenship Rules, 1956, 2004, 2009
 21D  Sub classification (indicate
            Rule/sub rule of the statute)                                        NA                                       
22.     Point of law and question
of law raised in  the case.                                      Discrimination between the migrants of West Pakistan, East Pakistan and Bangladesh in regard to granting Citizenship of India & rehabilitation.
23.     Whether matter is not be listed
            before any hon’ble judge ?
            Mention the name
            of the hon’ble judges.                                                  NO/NA
24.     Particulars of identical/similar
           case, if any.         
             i) Pending Cases                                               WP (civil) 243 of 2012 & 916 of 2014.
              ii) Decided cases with Citation                                  NA
25.     Whether the petition is against
              Interlocutory/final
             order/decree in the case.                                             NA
26.     If it is a fresh matter, please state
           name of The High Court and the corum
           in the  impugned judgement/order.                               NA
27.     If the matter was already listed in this court.                 NO
              i) When was it listed                                          NA
              ii) What was the Coram                                            NA
              iii) What was the direction of the Court           NA 
28.     Whether a date has already been fixed 
              Either by court or on being mentioned for
               The hearing of the matters ? If so, please
               Indicate the date fixed noted.                                    NA
29.     Is there is a caveator ? If so, whether
               notice has been issued to him ?                                NA
.         Whether date entered into computer.                       NA
30      Nature of Urgency                                                   Ex-parte ad interim orders
31.     If it is a criminal matter, please state                             NO
             i) Whether accused has surrender                        NA
             ii) Nature of offence, i.e. convicted
                  under section with Act.                                  NA 
i)                   Sentence Awarded                                            NA
ii)                Sentence already undergone by the accused              NA
32.     FIR / RC / ETC.                                                            NA
I)       Date of registration of FIR etc. Name & place               NA
II)    Case no. in trial court & date of judgement                   NA
III)  Name & place 1st Appellate Court                          NA    
IV) Case no. in 1st. Appellant
court & date of judgement                                      NA


                                                                                 Dr. Kailash Chand.
                                                        ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS

                              Synposis and List of Dates
                                                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           India, as defined in the Govt. of India Act, 1935, was partitioned on religious basis. After partition, lakhs of people were forced to migrate from West Pakistan, East Pakistan & Bangladesh to the territory of India for religious persecution. The migration of the people of Indian Origin for religious  persecution  and  fear of such persecution, were started during the period of independence and still going on. As & when the communal tensions increase and riots start in Bangladesh or in Pakistan, the rate of such migration of religious minorities of those countries to India increase.
A part of such migrated people  entered into India without Passport-Visa etc., were given the status of displaced persons/refugees, even many of them recognized as full fledged citizens of India in regard to job of the govt. of India, enlistment in the voters list, issuance of passport etc. without fulfilling ‘statutory requirements’, whereas other part, mostly downtrodden people, who migrated to India on or after 25th March, 1971, were victims of discrimination. They were defined as ‘Illegal Migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003’, prohibiting them from granting Citizenship of India and were subjected  to harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border against their will on the gun point of the BBG-BSF. In fact, the Govt. of India has been trying to push them back to their places of previous residence, where, they were persecuted and were forced to flee and there are substantial grounds for believing that, they would be again in danger of being torture in those countries. As per the principles laid down by the United Nations in the ‘convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’, no state party can do it. India is a signatory to the convention and the govt. of India should honour the principles of the convention of the United Nations.  
Overriding  the Article 5(1)(a) of ‘The Citizenship Act, 1955’ , the Govt. of India also issued a letter no. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971, directing all the State Governments/UTs  not to grant Indian Citizenship u/s  5(1)(a)  to those Migrants, who came to India on or after 25th March, 1971, during the period of Bangladesh Liberation war. Unfortunately, the said order of the govt. of India is still in force, yet not been declared withdrawn, without any valid ground, as 25th March, 1971, the day of independence of Bangladesh, does not carry any significance to the minorities of Bangladesh.  Because the country is still a Islamic country as was the Pakistan and the minorities of that country are subjected to religious persecution, torture and victim of injustices.  Due to the order of the Govt. of India, the Migrants of East Bengal are deprived of registering themselves as Citizens of India for more than 40 years.  As a result of the order of the govt. of India,  now, children and grandchildren of the migrants, who have born in India, are debarred from citizenship by birth u/s 3(1)(b) & 3(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act. 1955.
All the Migrants of Indian Origin are hard works, intelligent, patriot & loyal to India. They have been living in this country for several years to several decades and have been taking part to build up India. They have no connection with Bangladesh & Pakistan and their children & grand children were born in India.  They took part in the freedom struggle of the country on India’s side. The then govt. of India and the national leaders of the country also declared their commitment to the minorities of Pakistan to grant them citizenship of India and rehabilitation assistances in India. Now, the govt. of India cannot deny to grant them citizenship on the simple ground, that, they have migrated to India later on.
These Migrants are also entitled to get the status of displaced persons/ refugees  in accordance with the ‘United Nation’s Convention  relating to the status of Refugees adopted in 1951 and 1967 protocol and they cannot be defined as ‘illegal migrants’.
India has given shelter to the refugees from various countries like Tibet, Mayanmer, Afganithan etc. None of the refugees has been called as illegal migrant. Surprisingly, only the migrants of Indian origin were stamped as illegal migrants u/s 2(1)(b) of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. 2003. With a gazette notification on 7th September, 2015, the govt. of India has directed not to treat the migrants of Hindu and other minority communities of Bangladesh and Pakistan, who faced religious persecution in those countries, as illegal migrants. But the step of the govt. of India is not at all sufficient. The Citizenship Act. 1955 is to be amended suitably, so that, the migrants of Indian origin may not be called illegal migrants and they may be granted citizenship of India.   
The Indian Parliament in the clause 2 of ‘The Immigrants  (Expulsion from Assam ) Act, 1950’  also have given special protection to the Migrants of Indian Origin, who were compelled to be migrated from the territory now included in Bangladesh/Pakistan on account of Civil Disturbances or fear of such Disturbances.
On 18th December, 2003, when the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha, the then leader of the opposition Dr. Manmohan Singh and independent member Sri Shankar Roychowdhury from West Bengal appeal and pleaded for a special provision in the bill, so that, the migrants of Bangladesh, who were forced to leave the country for religious persecution or fear of such persecution, may be granted citizenship of India, when, on behalf of the govt. of India, the then Dy. Prime Minister of India and Home Minister Sri L. K. Advani  told the said migrants as ‘bona fide refugee’ and declared his consent to the proposal of the leader of the opposition and Sri Shankar Roychowdhury. Unfortunately, when the bill was finalized, no such provision was included in the Act. so that, the migrants may be granted citizenship of India.    
Being aggrieved for those injustices & discrimination against the Migrants of Indian Origin mentioned herein above, the unfortunate Migrants & their various Organizations,  many  democratic people of India have been fighting democratically since long years for justice. They have wrote several letters to the competent authorities, launched hunger strikes and even their representatives discussed with the Prime Minister of India & the Home Minister 3 / 4 times to achieve justice, but all in vain.
Therefore, for the interest of those unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin – the victims of partition of India, and without finding any other alternative, the petitioners being the Social Welfare Organizations of the intellectuals, lawyers and workers of civil liberty movements and also the public spirited persons  are compelled to file the instant Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by way of Writ Petition under Article 32 of the constitution of India before this Hon’ble Supreme Court for public interest and for the interest of justice.
                                              
                                        List of Dates

15.08.1947

British India was partitioned on religious basis resulting communal

riots & genocides both in India and Pakistan following a huge number

of migration of minorities from Pakistan to India

15.08.1947 to15.1.1950         

Speeches of the Prime Minister Pandit J. Nehru, President of India

Dr.Rajendra Prasad, Home Minister Sardar Bllavbhai Patel, Father of the

Nation Mahatma Gandhi towards the minorities of Pakistan for granting

them Citizenship of India, rehabilitation etc. 


01.03.1950
The Parliament of India enacted ‘The  Immigrants ( Expulsion from Assam )
 Act, 1950 ’ which extends to whole of India. The  Act. provided protection
to the Migrants, who were forced to migrate from their place of origin for
 civil disturbance etc. 
08.04.1950
Nehru-Liaquat pact was signed and the two countries – India & Pakistan
 assured protection to the minorities of their own country & some facilities
 & rights to the Migrants.
10.10.1951
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, father of the Indian Constitution expressed his deep
 concerned to the plight of the minorities of East Bengal in explanation of
 his resignation from the cabinet of Pandit J. Nehru on 10th October, 1951.
22.04.1954
On 28th July, 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the status of
 refugees adopted & declared some policies, which were effected from 22nd
 April, 1954, where India is not a signatory, but India have been honouring
the declaration of the UN’s from the beginning. India has given shelter to
 refugees of various countries without Bangladesh.
1955          
The Parliament of India has enacted ‘The Citizenship Act, 1955’  containing
 several Articles in Part II of the Indian Constitution & subsequent
amendments.
16.12.1966
Amendment to the Refugee Convention of the United Nations,  known as
 ’1967 Protocol’. Principles of the Protocol was formulated & adopted in the
 General Assembly of the UNs held on 16th December, 1966. The Protocol
got universal coverage.
29.11.1971
The Govt. of India issued an order/ letter No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th
 November, 1971 directing all the State Govt./UTs for not granting
 Citizenship u/s  5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act,1955, to the Migrants of East
 Bengal, the   Indian Origin, who came to India on or after 25th March, 1971.
26.06.1987
India is a signatory to the United Nations ’Convention against Torture &
other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment .‘ The United
 Nations General Assembly adopted this policy by resolution No. 39/46
 dated the 10th  December,1984 and was enforced on & from 26th June,
 1987. The Convention embodied the principles of ‘non-refoulement’,
where it is clearly stated that, no state party shall expel, return (refouler )
 or extradite a person to another state where there are substantial grounds
 for believing that, he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
01.07.1987
Parliament enacted ‘ the Citizenship ( Amendment ) Act, 1986 ‘ and placed
 the right of Citizenship by Birth under certain conditions affecting the
 interests of the migrated people .   
1988 – 89  
SeventIeth Report of the Estimate Committee ( 1988-89 ), Ministry of Home
 Affairs (Rehabilitation Division ) was presented to the Lok Sabha  on 12th
 April, 1989, which recommended to grant Citizenship to the Migrants of
East Pakistan without formal application & without fulfilling ‘Statutory
 Requirements’ on the pattern  adopted for the Migrants of West Pakistan
 around 1947 and pre 1966 Migrants to Assam.
09.01.1996
In the year 1996, the Supreme Court of India,  in a judgment to the case
 between National Human Rights Commission VS State of Arunachal
Pradesh (AIR 1996 SC 1234) directed the State Govt. to protect life &
 personal liberty of the Chakma Refugees residing in the State and not to
 evict them. The Hon’ble Court also directed to the District Magistrates to
 forward the applications of the Chakmas for Citizenship of India u/s 5(1)(a)
 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 to the competent authorities.   
17.10.1996 to 17.7.1997        
Only in the State of Assam  the Election Commission of India introduced the conception of ‘D’ Voters (D for doubtful ) prohibiting lakhs of genuine voters from casting votes in the general election, only based on doubt, that, they are not citizens of India. The list of the ‘D’ voters was prepared by the local authorities being politically motivated.
16.03.2001
The Govt. of Odisha, Home Department, directed to the District
Magistrates/Superintendents of Police to deport the Migrants of Indian
 Origin in accordance with the order of the Govt. No. PPT(P)60/2000-15681
dated the 16th March, 2001 without proper trial in the court of law.
18.12.2003   
‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003’ was moved in the Rajya Sabha on 18th
December, 2003 by the Hon’ble Deputy Prime Minister of India & Home Minister
 Sri L. K. Advani, when the opposition leader in the House Dr. Manmohan Singh &
other MPs demanded a special provision in the Bill for granting Citizenship to the
 Migrants of  Bangladesh, who have faced religious persecution in their place of
 origin & were forced to flee the country and took refuge in India. In response to
 the appeal of the MPs, Sri Advani expressed his consent to the demand.
 Unfortunately, the Bill was finalized as an Act. without  providing  any such
 special provision to protect the interest of the Hindu etc. migrants.
28.02.2004   
Govt. of Odisha, Home Department, issued 1551 notices to 1551 Hindu Migrants
of Mahakalpara Block, District Kendrapara on 28th December, 2004 & on several
 subsequent dates, directing them to quit India within 30 days from the date of
service of those notices.
01.03.2004   
No fees were levied from the persons of Indian Origin for application u/s 5(1)(a)
& 5(1)(d) as per the direction of the Clause No. 31(1) of the Citizenship Rules,
1956.  Now, fees of Rs.5000.00 for application  u/s  5(1)(a) & Rs.3000.00 for
application  u/s  5(1)(d) have been fixed for the Indian Origin as per the direction
of Clause 41 of the Citizenship Rules, 2009 (schedule IV). Most of the migrants
 of Indian Origin from East Bengal are poor in BPL category and unable
to pay the fees.
The Govt. of India made The Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2004 in their
application to the states of Gujrat and Rajasthan to facilitate the process of
granting Citizenship to the Migrants of West Pakistan, who came to India during
the war with Pakistan in 1965 & 1971. In fact, 1971 war took place in East Bengal,
but, the said facilities were not extended to East Bengal Migrants.
22.11.2001 & onwards      
Various Members of Parliament from several political parties have been raising questions since 22nd November, 2001 to till today, in the Parliament on different dates, in regard to religious persecution inflicted upon the minorities of Bangladesh, when on behalf of the Govt. of India, various Ministers have admitted that, the minorities of Bangladesh are subjected to harassment, injustice & torture. Very recently, on 7th September, 2015, the Central Govt. in a Gazette Notification also has admitted, that, the minorities of Bangladesh are subjected to religious persecution.
From 7th December, 2004 to till date, Members of Parliament both the Lok Sabha
& Rajya Sabha from various parties,  have been demanding for granting
Citizenship of India to the Migrants of Indian Origin, who have faced religious
persecution in their place of origin & were compelled to flee that country and
took refuge in India,  by way of Special Mentions & in Zero hours. MPs also have
wrote letters to the Prime Minister of India, Home Minister & President of India.
12.07.2005
In the case between Sarbananda Sonowal vs Union of India (AIR 2920 ),
three judges bench of the Supreme Court of India declared IM(DT) Act,1983
as ultra vires to the constitution of India and upheld ‘The Immigrants
(Expulsion from Assam ) Act, 1950’, where special protection to the forced
Migrants for Civil disturbances etc. is embodied in its Clause No. 2.
06.02.2007
The Convention of the United Nations General Assembly held on 20th
December, 2006 adopted the policy for protection from Enforced
Disappearance, where India has become a signatory to the Convention. The
Convention embodied the principles of ‘non-refoulement’ or extradite a
person to another state, where, there are substantial grounds of believing
that, he or she would be in danger of being tortured for enforced
disappearance.
23.11.2009
Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (Foreigners Division) issued an
order No. F-14011/55/09-F.VI, date 23.11.2009, which,  laid down certain
procedures by which, on the plea of identification of Bangladeshi, the bona
fide Migrants are being harassed and the Govt. & Police Authorities have
been throwing the said Migrants in the NO MAN”S land of the India-Bangladesh border.    
30.04.2010
The Govt. of West Bengal, Backward Class Department, has issued a circular
No. 1465 BCW/MR-67/10 dated the 30th April, 2010 directing all the
applicants for Caste Certificate to submit proof of residence in West Bengal /
India, since 1950 to prove their Citizenship of India. 
03.06.2010
The Election Commission, Lucknow, issued an order No. 140/E/10-N dated
the  3rd June, 2010 to delete the names of the Migrants of East Pakistan
who have been given  Rehabilitation Assistances / Settlement by the govt. of India in the stateof Uttar Pradesh on the plea that, they are not regular / registered Citizen of India.
22.12.2010
High Court of Delhi passed the Judgement in the case between Namgyal
Dolkar VS Govt. of India (WP-C 12179/2009) recognizing Dolkar, a Tibetian
origin, as an Indian Citizen by Birth in accordance with the Article 3(1)(a) of 
‘The Citizenship Act,1955, since, she born in India on or after 26th January,
1950 and  before 1st July, 1987.
07.08.2013
The High Court of Karnataka passed the judgement (No. 15437/2013) on
the petition of Tenzin Choephag Ling Rinpoche, a Tibetian origin,
recognizing him as an Indian Citizen by Birth, as per the Article 3(1)(a) of
‘The Citizenship Act, 1955, as he born in India on or after 26th January,
1950 and before 1st July, 1987.   
Last one decade  
Since one decade, the Migrants of East Pakistan & Bangladesh, who were
forced to flee those countries for religious persecution and fear of such
persecution, have been stamped as ‘Illegal migrants’ & debarred them from
granting Indian Citizenship. The Migrants of Indian Origin are subjected to
harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh borderagainst their will. Thus the Govt. of India has been :
A       Violating the commitment of the National Leaders of India &
declared policy of the then Govt. of India.
B       Violating the directions of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution
 of India by discriminating between the Migrants of  West
Pakistan and East Pakistan, as well as  Pre & post 1971
Migrants.
C       Violating the principles of the United Nations in regard to refugees by deporting the Migrants to NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border, where, they were tortured and there are substantial grounds of believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture again and also  violating the Article 22(4) of the Constitution by  confining Migrants in the detention camp for indefinite period.
          07.09.2015
The govt. of India has issued a Gazette Notification directing, not to call the Hindu and other minorities of Bangladesh and Pakistan, who were forced to leave those countries for religious persecution and fear of such persecution and entered into India without valid documents etc.
  
The petitioners have been supporting,  co-operating & coordinating the
struggles of the Bengali Migrants since long times by various ways. Now,
finding no other alternative, for the end of justice,  the instant Public
Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution,  is filed
before the Supreme Court of India in the form of Writ Petition for  Public
interest and also for the interest of Justice as well as to complete the
Justice upon those unfortunate Migrants of Pakistan and Bangladesh, who
are victim of partition of India and seek refuge in India  facing persecution
in their place of origin.
17.09.2015
The Supreme Court of India has given judgment on the case No. WP (Civil) – 510 of 2007 on 17th September, 2015 to grant Citizenship of India to the Chakma and Hajong migrants of East Bengal within three months from 1st September, 2015.

                            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                                   ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  NO.                               OF 2015
                                (Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India)

IN THE MATTER OF
1    Solidarity committee for Bengali Refugees                        Petitioners
                  907, Soondarhi Station Road, Pilibhit
                  Dist. : Pilibhit
                  Uttar Pradesh,   Pin Code : 262001
2    Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam ( CRPC )
       ( Regn. No. 2729/1995-96 )
       House No. – 42, Beltala  P.O. – Khanapara Road
       Guwahati – 781022
3    All India Namasudra Kalyan Parisad
 Shanti Nagar, Palta, P.O. – Nona Chandanpur
 Dist. – North 24 Parganas, Kolkata - 700122

4    Nityananda Mallick, Practicing Advocate
 S/O Late Raj Kumar Mallick
 Maharajpur, P.O.- Gobiasarai
 Dist. Pilibhit,UP. Pin - 262122

                  VERSUS
1        The Union of India                                                             Respondents
                  Through the Principal Secretary,
                    Office of the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
                    South Block, New Delhi – 110011
2        The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs,
Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi  
          3        The Secretary, Ministry of Law,
Govt. of India, New Delhi
4        The Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs,
Govt. of India, New Delhi
5        The Election Commission of India,
New Delhi
6        State of Assam
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat,
Dishpur, Guwahati
7        State of West Bengal
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Kolkata, West Bengal
8        State of Odisha
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Bhubaneswar, Odisha
9        State of Manipur
                    Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
          Imphal, Manipur
10      State of Tripura
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Agartala, Tripura
11      State of Uttaranchal
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Dehradun, Uttaranchal.
12      State of Uttar Pradesh,
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Lucknow, U.P
13      State of Madhya Pradesh.
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Bhopal, M.P.
14      State of Bihar
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Patna, Bihar
15      State of Chhatisgarh
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Raypur, Chhatisgarh
16      State of Karnataka
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Banglore, Karnataka.
17      State of Andhra Pradesh
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Hyderabad, A.P.
18      State of Maharastra
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Mumbai, Maharastra.
19      State of Rajasthan
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Jaipur, Rajasthan
20      State of Punjab
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Chandigarh, Punjab.
21      State of Arunachal Pradesh
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh
22      State of Meghalaya
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Shilong, Meghalaya
23      State of Jharkhand
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Ranchi, Jharkhand
24      State of Tamil Nad
                   Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Channai, TN.
25       State of Gujrat
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
Ahmedabad, Gujrat
26      State of Delhi
Through, The Chief Secretary, Secretariat
New Delhi
27      Andaman & Nicobar Island
Through it’s Administrator,Portblair

         
To
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
And His Companion Justices of
The Supreme Court of India
New Delhi

                                  The humble petition of the petitioners above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH,

1    The instant Writ Petition under Article 32 of the constitution of India by way of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for directions upon the Respondents that :
i)       Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent No. 1 and other concerned Respondents not to define the Migrants of Indian Origin, who are victim of partition of India and faced religious persecution in their place of origin i.e. in Pakistan & Bangladesh and were forced to flee those countries to India, pre & post 1971 periods, as ‘illegal migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of ‘The  Citizenship (amendment) Act, 2003 as well as the Citizenship Act, 1955.
ii)     Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus,  directing the Respondents No. 1,2 and other concerned Respondents to declare all the Migrants, who were forced to flee Pakistan & Bangladesh, pre & post 1971 periods, for religious persecution & fear of such persecution and have been ordinarily residents  in the territory of India, as Citizens of India on the pattern adopted for the Migrants of  West Pakistan around 1947 and who migrated to the state of Assam before 1st day of January, 1966.  
iii)   Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing Respondents No. 1, 2 and other concerned Respondents to repeal the Express Letter of the Home Department, Govt. of India, No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971, since the letter overrides the directions of the Clause 5(1)(a)’  of  ‘The Citizenship Act, 1955 and also declare the decision of Cut Off date 25th March, 1971, as illegal.
iv)   Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1,2 and other concerned Respondents to exempt the persons of Indian Origin from levied fees for Citizenship Registration. Instead of applying the paragraph no. 41 ( Schedule  IV) of the ‘The Citizenship Rules, 2009,  direct the Respondents to apply Clause No. 31(1) of ‘The Citizenship Rules, 1956’ in this regard.
v)     Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 5 and other concerned Respondents to repeal the conception of ‘D’-Voter  (D for doubtful) in Assam, as the  list of ‘D’ Voters has been prepared simply based on doubts being politically motivated  by the local authorities, which has prohibited lakhs of genuine Voters from rights to cast votes & also stop the trials of the ‘D’ Voters and detention. Also repeal the  Sub Section 4 of Article 6A of the ‘Citizenship Act,1955’, which prohibits the Rights of  Citizens to cast votes up to 10 years even after registering themselves as Indian Citizens.
vi)   Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.8 and other concerned Respondents to Repeal the 1551 notices issued on the Hindu Migrants of Mahakalpara Block of District Kendrapara,  Odisha, by which the Migrants have been ordered to quit India without trials and orders of the court & such other notices.
vii) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 5 and other Respondents to enlist the names of the pre & post 1971  Migrants of Indian Origin in the Voters List and to Issue them Ration Cards, BPL Cards, Caste Certificates, Adhar Cards etc. & such other rights to those Migrants, who have faced religious persecution in Pakistan and in Bangladesh, their place of Origin and were forced to flee those country & took refuge in India.
2        That earlier, the present petitioners never filed any such Writ         Petition / PIL on the same-self cause of actions and such relief, as stated above, before this Hon’ble Supreme Court of India or any other court of Law in India.
3     That the petitioners 1, 2 & 3 being the Social Welfare Organizations    and the petitioner No. 4, being the practicing Lawyer/Advocate and a public spirited citizen of India, are being compelled to file this PIL before this Apex Court of India for the interest of those unfortunate Migrants, mostly illiterate, poor, downtrodden and have been ordinarily residents in the territory of India since long times from several years to several decades. They are all persons of Indian Origin and victim of partition. They have come from Pakistan & Bangladesh, facing religious persecution in those countries and  fear of such persecution. They have been living in Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Manipur, Tripura, Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Chhatisgarh, Karnataka, Andhara Pradesh, Maharastra, Rajasthan, Andaman Islands, Punjab, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya & in some other States/UTsof the country. Many of them, yet, are not been recognized as  citizens of India and they are not getting any kinds of civic rights & facilities. They have been living in a distress condition in the remote areas, along sides of the Railway Trucks, Roads & the Canals. The Migrants are mostly Bengali Hindus. They are intelligent, patriots & loyal to India. They have fought in the independence struggle by India’s side. They are hard workers  and  have been taking part to build up this country, particularly, for the agriculture developments in Nainital areas,  Dandakaranya,  Andaman Island, Assam, Tripura, & in West Bengal. Unfortunately, instead of recognizing their great role for development of this country, now a days, they are stamped as ‘Illegal Migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of the citizenship Act. of India subject to harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border.. Under the circumstances, for the interest of Justice, the present petitioners have filed this PIL for the interest of those unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin and as such,  for  fundamental rights as granted under Article 14, 21, 20(1) & 22(4) in Part III of the Constitution of India,  and also for the constitutional provisions as envisaged in the principal Articles 5, 6 & 8 in part II of the Indian Constitution regarding Citizenship. Also for the Clause 2 of   ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam ) Act, 1950 and the declaration/principles/rules  of the United Nations on the status of Refugees  as well as against violation of other National & International Human Rights  Rules / Principles of Natural Justice.
4   Undivided India (as defined in the Govt. India Act. 1935) was partitioned on religious basis resulting communal riots & genocides both in Pakistan and India, following by a huge number of migration of minority people from Pakistan to India. The religious minorities of Pakistan were forced to leave that country for religious persecution and fear of such persecution. The  migration of religious minorities of Pakistan were started during the time of partition and still going on. As & when the communal tension and riots start in Pakistan & Bangladesh, the rate of migration of religious minorities from those countries to India increase. By this way lakhs of Migrants have entered into India during the period from 1947 to till date. Some of these Migrants have enter into India with Passport-Visa etc. , but most of them entered into India illegally, as it was almost impossible for them to collect Passport-Visa or any such other legal permission to cross the border at that abnormal situations.
5   All the Migrants of Indian Origin are victims of partition of India  and  liable to equal treatment by the Govt. of India in respect of grant of Citizenship of India, compensation & rehabilitation. But unfortunately, the Govt. of India has divided those Migrants into four different categories and has been treating them in different ways, namely – i) those migrated from West Pakistan around 1947, ii) those  migrated to Assam on or before 31st December, 1965, iii) those migrated from East Bengal prior to 25th March, 1971 and iv) those migrated from Bangladesh on or after 25th March, 1971.
6   The migrants came from West Pakistan to India around 1947, were deemed to be full fledged Citizens of India in respect of enlistment in Voters list, appointment in  Govt. services  etc. without fulfilling the ‘statutory requirements’. They were  given  compensations and better rehabilitation assistances  than the Migrants from East Pakistan.
The 70th Report (seventieth report) of the Estimates Committee (1988-89), Ministry of Home Affairs (Rehabilitation Division) in regard to Rehabilitation of Migrants from East Bengal, presented to  the Lok Sabha on 12th April, 1989 stated as follows :
“Paragraph 1.25 --  The Committee are pained to note that, people who migrated to India from former East Pakistan prior to 25-3-1971 are still treated by Government as ‘Displaced Persons’ and are only eligible to be considered for grant of Indian Citizenship by registration u/s 5(1)(a) of the Act., provided fulfill the ‘Statutory Requirements’ with the result that, in effect, they live in India as ‘Stateless’ people, many of whom have failed to acquire Indian Citizenship for one reason or  another and have been either denied employment or even thrown out of jobs on the ground of Citizenship. The status of these Migrants from former East Pakistan appears to be in stark contrast with the position of displaced persons from West Pakistan who migrated in India around 1947 and for all practical purposes, namely, employment etc. are deemed to be full  fledged Citizens of India. The representatives of the Ministry of Home Affairs have admitted during evidence, that, those persons who migrated to India from former East Pakistan prior to 25th March, 1971, specially old & new migrants have come to settle in India permanently and have been provided rehabilitation assistance in one form or another. In view of this, the Committee are of the view that, these Migrants, specially old and new Migrants should not be required to undergo the cumbersome formalities of Registering themselves under the Citizenship Act. in order to get a Citizenship Certificate and consequent right to vote etc. The Committee strongly recommend that, as matter of policy of Old and New Migrants should also be deemed to be Citizens of India  on the pattern of ‘pre 1961 (now 1966) Migrants to Assam’ and displaced persons from West Pakistan, so that, they do not have to hanker after the various authorities to get their Citizenship Certificates to earn their livelihood and be able to vote etc.  They are of the view that, if necessary, suitable legislative measures with regard to the status, Citizenship and rehabilitation and monitoring of rehabilitation schemes etc. should be enacted with due expedition”.  
The Report also stated that :
“Paragraph 1.6 --  To meet all the multifarious obligations in this regard the following legislative enactments had been provided by the Government –
A  Administration of Evacuee Property Act. 1950
B  Displaced Persons Claims Act.1950.
C  Evacuee Interest (Separation) Act. 1951.
D  Displaced Persons Debt Adjustment Act. 1951.
E  Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation ) Act.1954.
F   Displaced Persons Claims Supplementary Act. 1954”.
“Paragraph 1.9   Asked why was Parliament never taken into confidence directly with regard to the policy, form and  content of Rehabilitation  Assistance provided to Migrants from former East Pakistan, even though relief and rehabilitation of displaced persons consequent to partition was the concurrent responsibility of both the Centre as well as State Government concerned, the Ministry has stated in a written answer, that, in the case of East Pakistan Migrants, no compensation for the properties left behind in Pakistan was to be paid as they retained proprietary rights in their  properties. These they could exchange, sell or disposed of in any manner they pleased till the outbreak of hostilities between India & Pakistan in 1965, when Pakistan seized the properties of Indian nationals. According to the Ministry, no separate legislation was considered necessary for mere grant of rehabilitation assistance.”    
7   The persons of Indian Origin who have migrated from  the territory now included in Bangladesh to Assam up to 31st December, 1965, they were deemed to be Citizens of India without fulfilling ‘Statutory Requirements’, but the Migrants were not provided with Compensation and proper rehabilitation assistance.
The Citizenship Act,1955 provides the Special Provision as follows:
“6A (2) – Special provisions as to Citizenship of persons covered by the Assam Accord --   Subject to the provisions (6) and (7) , all persons of Indian Origin who came before the 1st day of January, 1966 to Assam from the specified territory (including such of those whose names were included in the electoral rolls used for the purposes of the General Election to the House of the People held in 1967) and who have been ordinarily residents in Assam since the dates of their entry into Assam shall be deemed to be Citizens of India as from the 1st day of January, 1966.”
8   The Migrants of East Pakistan who came to India before 25th March, 1971 : A small section of the Migrants of East Pakistan who came before 25th March, 1971 were given rehabilitation with less  facilities than the Migrants of West Pakistan , but they were not deemed to be Indian Citizen. Most of them could not fulfill the  statutory  requirements, hence, they are ‘Stateless People’ in India.  Most of those Migrants are illiterate,  poor & they did not know the necessity and importance of Citizenship.
Most of these Bengali Migrants are downtrodden farmers & fishermen.  Amongst them, those  got settlement assistance  to the hardship areas out of West Bengal , in the early stage of their settlement, they fought only to survive and they had no scope to approach for Citizenship by  way of registration  u/s 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. Most of them were settled in the Dandakaranya, Andaman Islands, Nainital areas & in some other States, mostly Jungle Areas, where no civic facilities were available.
Many of these families could not tolerate the pains suffered in those early days and flee from the camps & from place of their settlement. Those absconded families used to move from one camp to another camps and even from one state camps to another state camps, where their villagers, relatives & known persons were settled. In this way many families lost their enlistment as Migrants. Some of the family members & relatives of the Migrants also joined later on with their families and they also could not enlist their names as Migrants.
In fact, 3 / 4th of the total Bengali Migrants did not agree to go out of West Bengal for relief & rehabilitation assistance. It is also clear from the report of the Estimates Committee (1988-89) of the Ministry of home  Affairs  (Rehabilitation Division) that, the West Bengal Govt. did not rehabilitated to the Migrants properly . As a result, a huge number of Migrants, both old Migrants (up to March 1958) &  new Migrants (1.1.1964 to 25th March, 1971) and the Migrants came during the period from 1959 to 31.12.1963 lost interests to rehabilitation assistance and did not enlisted themselves in the camps. They managed at their own and gradually assimilated themselves with the people of West Bengal. The Committee report also mentioned about the huge numbers ofmissing families’, it means, those did not move for rehabilitation assistance.
These lakhs of unlisted & ‘missing persons’ have been living in India for several decades as ‘Stateless People’,  since, they could not registered themselves as Citizen of India u/s  5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act,1955
Now, all these unlisted & missing persons have no such valid/legal documents to satisfy the ‘Statutory Requirements’’to register their names as Indian Citizens. Apart from those mentioned herein above, since  1st April, 1986, the Govt. of India, Home Department,  is the competent   authority to issue the  Citizenship Certificates  in place of District Collectors of the Districts. In the past, no fees were  levied from the applicants of Indian Origin as per ‘The Citizenship Rules. 1956, paragraph 31 (1) for registration as Citizens, but now, in the Citizenship Rules, 2009 (Scheduled IV) Rs.5000/- fees have been fixed for such applications u/s 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act.
Most of the religious minorities of East Pakistan and Bangladesh have migrated at the time of abnormal situations of riots or  fear of such riots  and naturally could not collect Passport-Visa or any such legal permission to cross the border. Border slips were also not available in most of the points of the border. Thus, they arrived in India without any kinds of document/evidence to prove the dates & times of their entry into India.  Among the Migrants, who had some documents, they have lost it at the time of moving from one camp to another camps. They also did not know the importance of those documents, if, they had any document.  For all these reasons of non-availability of documents for crossing the border, it is also not possible for the Govt. authorities to identify the pre 1971 Migrants & the post 1971 Migrants. Those Migrants came to India before 1971, now, they are not in a position to prove their claims.  
As a result, lakhs of Migrants, who came to India  before  1971, are not in a position to acquire the Indian Citizenship by fulfilling the ‘Statutory Requirements’. Thus, in accordance with the clause 2(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act in force, these unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin,  are  declared as ‘illegal migrants’ and subject to harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border,  which is very unjust & injustice .
9  The Migrants of Bangladesh, have come to India on or after 25th March, 1971 --   Govt. of  India  Issued an order No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971 for not to grant Citizenship of India to the Migrants of East Bengal u/s  5(1)(a) of  ‘The Citizenship Act, 1955 expecting that the Migrants shall be returned back to  their place of origin when the conditions permit. The Bangladesh was liberated and most of the Migrants returned back with the hope, that, they will be able to stay there with peace & harmony. But it was not happened.
In the early stage of  independence, Bangladesh Govt. declared its state character as Secularism. They declared to treat the minorities of the country equally with the religious majority citizens and to protect them from religious persecution etc. Unfortunately, they did not stand strict to their commitment. In the year 1977, for the  first  time,  they replaced the word secularism by the word ‘absolute trust and faith in Almighty Allah shall be the basis of all actions’. Ultimately, in 1988 with the  Eighth  Amendment to the Constitution of Bangladesh , they declared that the ‘Islam will be the State Religion of Bangladesh’.  In this way the Govt. of Bangladesh eliminated all the sign of differences with the former East Pakistan, except changing the name of the country.
With such changes in principles of the State, various kinds of repressions, particularly, during the period of Emergency in Bangladesh in 1975-76 and communal riots in 1992, 2001 & in several other occasions and grabbing of lands of the religious minorities by the Muslims in various ways continued.  As a result, the religious minorities of Bangladesh being demoralized, tortured  and for such other religious persecution,  were forced to flee and took refuge in India.
When India was partitioned, the percentage of Hindus in East Pakistan was approximately 30%. During the period of Pakistan it reduced to nearly 18% in 1970 and now, in the period of Bangladesh Hindu populations have been further reduced to 9.2% in 2001, because the Hindus & other religious minority people faced religious persecution in the country and did not feel the country safe for them. At the time of answering the questions to the various Members of Parliament, whether, the religious minorities  of  Bangladesh  are subject to torture or not?  In reply, on  behalf  of  the Govt. of India has been admitted, that , they are subject to religious persecution. Very recently on 7th September, 2015, the Central Govt. of India, in a Gazette Notification also  have admitted that the minorities of Bangladesh are subjected to religious persecution. Considering all the facts & circumstances , it is crystal clear, that, the decision of cut-off date 25th March,1971, imposed by  the Govt. of India is baseless, wrong & unjust, hence, the Migrants , who have come to India after    25th March, 1971 should not be called & treated as ‘illegal migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act..
The said  Order of the Govt. of India, Home Depart imposing cut off date 25th March, 1971 is as follows:-
“Govt. of  India’s  Express letter regarding grant of Citizenship to the people who came from Bangladesh after the 25th March, 1971.
(Express letter no. 26011/16/71-10
Dated, New Delhi, the 29th November, 1971)
To : The Chief Secretaries to all  State Governments and Union Territories, Administration.
Sub : Grant of Indian Citizenship to refugees from East Bengal who have crossed over to India after 25th March, 1971 .
Instruction that applications from such refugees for Indian Citizenship should not be entertained.
Refugees who have crossed over to India from East Bengal since the 25th March, 1971 on account of the situation in the area cannot be treated as ordinarily resident of India. They are expected to return to their native places when the conditions   permit.  They should not be considered for registration as Indian Citizenship under section 5(1)(a) of the citizenship Act, 1955 read with the citizenship rules, 1956. If such refugees make applications to the Collectors who are the prescribed authorities for purpose of registration as Indian citizenship under the section 5(1)(a) of the citizenship Act., such  applications should be rejected. Enquiries on application for registration under section 5(1)(a)of the Act.  should  be made carefully to ensure that no refugee who has come after 25th March, 1971 from East Bengal gets registered as Indian citizen by giving any false declaration claiming to be resident in India for long and from date prior to the 25th March, 1971. Suitable Instructions may kindly be issued in the matter to all registering authorities under your control immediately.
                                                                                 C. L. Goyal
                                                             Under Secretary to the Govt. Of India
10      The Oder of the Govt. of India No. 26011/16/71-10 is clear cut over ridding of the Article 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, hence, the petitioners appeal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court to repeal the  Order of the Govt.
The Article 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 is as follows :
“ 5. Citizenship by registration --- (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and such conditions and restriction as may be prescribed , the prescribed authority may , on application made in this behalf , registered as a citizen of India any person who is not already such citizen by virtue of the Constitution or by virtue of any of the other provisions of this Act. and  belongs to any of the following categories –
a)     Persons of Indian origin who are ordinarily resident in India have been resident for five years (w.e.f  1.7.1987) immediately before making an application for registration.”
                                     
11      In the Parliament of India,   many Members of Parliament have expressed their concerned and raised several questions in various dates in regard to religious persecutions of the minorities of Bangladesh.
The Hon’ble Members of Parliament  Smt. Jayaprada Nahata, Sri Kapil Sibal, Sri K. Kalavenkata Rao, Sri Adityanath Yogi, Sri Vijay Kr. Malhotra, Sri Pyarilal Khandelwal , Sri Sanjoy Rout, Sri B. J. Panda, Pramila Bohidar, Sri Sreegopal Vyas & other Members of Parliament have raised questions in the Parliament in regard to Torture & injustices inflicted upon the religious minorities of Bangladesh.
In reply, the  following Ministers have admitted in various times , that, the religious minorities of Bangladesh are subject to injustices & religious persecution – copies of the questions and replies of the Hon’ble Ministers Sri Jaswant Sungh, Sri Digvijay Singh, Sri Vinod Khanna, Sri E Ahmed, Sri Pranab Kr. Mukherjee are  annexed herewith as ANNEXURE No.P/ 1,    Page No. 84)
12      Very recently, on 7th September, 2015, the Govt. of India, Ministry  of Home Affairs has issued a press information in regard to Gazette Notification where the Govt. of India has admitted that the Hindus and other minorities of Bangladesh and Pakistan were compelled to flee that country due to religious persecution and fear of such persecution and seek refuge in India. According to  the official Gazette Notification, the Migrants of Bangladesh and Pakistan are exempted from being identified as illegal migrants. The Press Release of the Ministry of Home Affairs are as follows :
                                                                            “Date :07 September,2015      
Exemptions to minority community nationals from Bangladesh and Pakistan in regularization of their entry and stay in India.
The Central Government has decided, on humanitarian consideration, to exempt Bangladeshi and Pakistani nationals belonging to minority communities who have entered into India on or before 31st December, 2014 from the relevant provisions of rules and order made under the Passport (Entry into India) Act. 1920and the Foreigners Act, 1946 in respect of their entry and stay in India without such documents or after the expiry of those documents, as the case may be. The Central Government has accordingly issued two notifications in the official gazette today under the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 and the Foreigners Act, 1946.
There are reports that a number of Bangladeshi and Pakistani nationals belonging to minority communities in those countries, such as Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, Parsis  and Buddhists, were compelled to seek shelter in India due to religious persecution and fear of religious  persecution. They have entered into India either without any valid document including Passport /other travel document or with valid documents but the validity of such document has expired.
The issue of regularization of entry and stay of such Bangladeshi and Pakistani nationals in India has been under consideration of the Central Government”.
13      India, as defined in the Govt. of India Act. 1935, was partitioned without the consent of the people of India i.e. without any plebiscite. The British Rulers, Congress & the Muslim League sat together and decided to partition the country. This partition created severe communal riots & causes great harms to the religious minorities of both the countries – India & Pakistan, forcing them to be migrated from their place of origin. Considering the plight of the Hindus, Sikhs & other  minorities of West and East Pakistan, the national leaders of India and on behalf of the Govt. of India , the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Home Minister and Mahatma Gandhi made some commitment towards the religious minorities of Pakistan as follows :
Father of the nation Mahatma Gandhi declared in a prayer meeting on 26th September, 1947 that “The Hindus and the Sikhs staying in Pakistan, can come to India by all means, if, they do not wish to continue there. In that case , it is the first duty of the Indian Govt. to give them job and make their lives comfortable.”   
(Collected works of Mahatma Gandhi,  Vol. 89, Page 246, Publication Division, Govt. of India )
Dr. Rajendra Prasad, President of India declared in the Oath taking ceremony  told  that, “We are anxious to rehabilitate displaced persons who have suffered and still suffering great hardships and privations”.
(Speech of Rajendra Prasad ,  , Publication Division, Govt. of India, Vol. 1, Page 2 )
Prime Minister of India Pandit J. Nehru stated during the declaration of  Independence  that “ We also think of our brothers & sisters cut off from us by political boundaries and who unhappily  cannot share at present in the freedom that has come.  They are of us and will remain of us whatever may happen and we shall be sharer in their good &ill fortune alike”.
(India’s  foreign policy : Selected speeches of Mr. Nehru, Pages 15-16, ‘Publication Division, Govt. of India)
In another speech Pandit Nehru Declared, “Now, I have said & say again that, in my opinion the Hindu minority  in East Bengal feels insecure and therefore cannot settle down. They want to come away , even if they remain, they do not know how long they will remain “. 
( Speeches of Mr. Nehru,  Vol. 2, Pages 155, ‘Publication Division, Govt. of India)
Pandit Nehru told in the Constituent Assembly on 9th August, 1950 as follow ; “We must apply ourselves to the task of rehabilitation,  not only because it is our duty to do so, but because it is not in the interest of the nation to leave these people where they are , doing nothing and suffering”.
( Speeches of Mr. Nehru, vol. 2,  Page No. 176, Publication Division, Govt. of India)
Sardar Ballavbhai Patel declared on the 15th January, 1950 about the minorities of the then East Pakistan, “ Those who are our flesh & blood , those who  fought by our side in the freedom struggle, cannot suddenly become foreigners to us because they are on the other side of a line. There are people in  South Africa, peoples of Indian origin, but with African Citizen, whom we still try to help. If they have a claim on us , surely those in that part of Bengal too have a claim “.
(Speeches of Mr. Patel,, Pages 121, ‘Publication Division, Govt. of India)
14      After partition of our country a large number of Migrants of East Pakistan entered into Assam. The rate of entry of Migrants into Assam increased due to communal tensions and riots break out in East Pakistan in 1950s. For the interest of Assam and its economy from degenerating under the pressure of influx ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam ) Bill,1950 was introduced in the Parliament on 20th December, 1949.
Taking part in the debate on the Bill in the Parliament Hon’ble Member of Parliament from Punjab, Sardar Bhopinder Singh Mann told – “Not only now, but at any future date, if, due to civil disturbances there in East Pakistan or if they find that , their stay is so uncomfortable And political conditions are such that , no person with honour could stay on, they should be permitted to come over here and in no way should it be conditioned by any clause that their stay should not be detrimental to the interest of India and then only they would be permitted to stay on. Therefore, I want a proviso to be added in order that the Assam Govt. may not be permitted to eject Hindu refugees, that is those refugees who have come and sought refuge in India because they found Pakistan to be an unworthy place for living”.
Hon’ble Member of Parliament Smt. Sucheta Kripalini from Uttar Pradesh pleaded as follows :  “We cannot deny our responsibility towards those people ( Hindus of East Pakistan ). They are citizens of India. They fought for the freedom of India. But today unfortunately they have been   left beyond the limit of India. We know that , Pakistan has been following a systematic policy by which Hindus have been gradually pushed out., they will have to find shelter………… We cannot close our eyes to that fact. Even if, it is difficult for our economy to support it, we have to give shelter to those shelter less people. It is a moral obligation.”
Sri A. C. Guha, Hon’ble Member of Parliament from West Bengal told,  “ to allay this suspicion of the Bengali settlers and refugees there in Assam , I wish something like a proviso be added at the end of clause 2 to the effect that the provisions of this Bill will not be applied to anybody who is a refugee or displaced persons…… “.
In reply to the debate in the Parliament and accepting the proposal of the Members of Parliament , the then Minister of Transport & Railways , Sri  Gopal  Swamy submitted as follows :  “those who subsequent to the partition of India on 15th August, 1947 , have migrated in fear to Assam , because of disturbances in Pakistan or the fear of their being badly dealt with Pakistan, with regard to that category of people also,…… we could , by executive action , effectively prevent this measure from being applied to such persons. But, I see that, there is a very large volume of feeling in the House in this matter , that, this matter should be made perfectly clear in the Bill itself, and I propose to accept the proposed proviso  …. . The idea is to make the Bill itself  prevent the application of this enactment to such People.”  
15      On 1st March, ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam), Act. 1950  was passed . It extends to whole of India. The clause 2 of the said Act is as follows : “Power to Order expulsion of certain immigrants  ---   If the central Govt. is of opinion that any person or class of persons, having been ordinarily in any place outside India, has or have , whether before or after the commencement of this Act. , come into Assam is detrimental to the interests of the general public of India or any section or of any scheduled Tribe in Assam, the Central Govt. may by order ---
a)       Direct such person or class of persons to remove himself or themselves from India or Assam with such time and by such route as may be specified in the order  and removal from India or Assam as it may consider necessary or expedient.
Provided that, nothing in this section shall apply to any person , who on account of civil disturbances or the fear of such disturbances in any area now forming part of Pakistan has been displaced from or has left his place or residence in such area and who has been subsequently residing in Assam.”
16      Thus, the clause No. 2 of the Act mentioned herein above has given protection in India to the religious minorities of East Pakistan & Bangladesh who on account of civil disturbances /religious persecution were forced to flee that country and took refuge in India/Assam. In fact, this Act. may be called the statutory arrange of the declaration of the then govt. of India and the national leaders to the minorities migrants of Pakistan.
17      It is a well known fact, that ,the Hindus and other minorities of East Bengal have been facing religious persecution in their place of origin forcing them to migrate to Assam, West Bengal & in other states of India.  Among Such Migrants, those have migrated to Assam up to 31st December, 1965 and staying in the state of Assam, are   entitled  to certain protection and Citizenship without fulfilling ‘statutory requirements’ But, unfortunately, in the same state, lakhs of  Hindu Migrants have been declared as  D – voters  and are subjected  to harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border who migrated to the state later on. This decision is unjust and illegal. Therefore, imposition of the concept of  D – Voters upon the Hindu Migrants be stopped with immediate effect.        
18      The concept of D – Voters implemented in Assam in the year 1997. Around 3.5 lakh voters were marked as D – Voters and the cases  were referred to the appropriate tribunals. The Election Commission of India vide letter No. 23/AS/96-VOL 3 dated the 5th January, 1998, had directed that the D – Voters would not be allowed to cast their votes in General Elections to the House of People etc. , so long as , their Citizenship status will not be determined by appropriate tribunal.
In Assam, around 3.5 lakh voters were marked as D – Voters, based only on doubt by the local verification officers. The marking was done being politically motivated and mostly, the names of the  poor & illiterate Bengali speaking  Hindus,  were enlisted in the D – voters list i.e. the Bengali Hindu Migrants are the main sufferers.  From 1998 to 2012 the Tribunals have given verdict on 88192 cases of the D – Voters and amongst the cases only 6590 were declared as foreigners by the Tribunals i.e. only 7.4 %  D- Voters were detected as foreigners.
Thus, it is beyond doubt that more than 92% of the total D-Voters are genuine Citizens of India, who have been debarred from casting votes and other fundamental rights of a Citizen and were subjected to harassment, arrest, trial & under detention for indefinite period. It is a clear case of violation of the Articles 14,21 & 20(1)  of the Indian Constitution. Articles 14,21 & 20(1) are as follows:
“Article 14 – Equality before law :- The state shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India”.
”Article  21 – Protection of life and personal liberty :- No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law”.
“Article  20(1) – Protection in respect of conviction for offences :- No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence”.
19      In Assam ,  the  Tribunals have declared some of the D –Voters as foreigners ex parte and confined them in the detention camps. In fact, many of those D – Voters did not  got the notices in regard to the trials. They are victims of conspiracy.  Many of such incidents of non-issuance of notices, Smt. Anita Chakraborty,  Smt Niyati Biswas are amongst them, were declared as foreigners ex parte.

20      In Assam, many D - Voter  Migrants of East Bengal have been confined in the detention camps/ jails for long times, even for several years. They have been detained for indefinite periods. Many of them are children & women. Among others Smt. Pranati Das, Smt. Titibala Das are under detention. Very recently an old man (D Voter) of 102 years Sri Repati Das were arrested and detained on the plea that he is a foreigner. These Migrants are not criminals. Most of them were arrested & detained as a precautionary measure , so that, they may not be able to flee /vanished . The D Voters are generally detained without any specific confinement order of the court of law i.e. detained for indefinite periods.  Also those Migrants / persons are detected to be foreigners, are confined in the detention camps for indefinite periods as there is no such pact / treaty between India & Bangladesh in respect of repatriation / rehabilitation. Nayurally,   Bangladesh Govt. also has been denying to accept those Migrants / persons.  As a result, the Govt. of India Authorities have been either detaining the unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin for indefinite periods or deporting them to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border on the Gun Point of the BBG & BSF violating the   Articles 22(4), 14 & 21 of the Indian Constitution and it is also violation of the ‘convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ adopted in the general assembly of the United Nations on 10th December, 1984.
21      The Article No. 22(4) of the Constitution of India is as follows :
“Article 22(4) – Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases :- No law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a longer period than three months unless :-
a)     an advisory board consisting of persons who are or have been, or are  qualified to be appointed as, Judges of a High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention :
Provided that nothing in this sub-clause shall authorize the detention of any person beyond the maximum period prescribed by any law made by Parliament under sub-clause (b) of clause (7); or

b)    such person is detained in accordance with the provisions of any law made by Parliament under sub-clauses (a) and (b) of clause (7)”.  
22      The people of Indian Origin , who have migrated to Assam on or after 1st January, 1966 and before 25th March, 1971 from the territory now included in Bangladesh and ordinarily residents of Assam and who have been detected as a foreigner, are entitled to apply for Indian Citizenship u/s 5(1)(a).  Amongst those applicants, who subsequently recognized as Citizens of India by the competent Authorities, they should be entitled to all the rights as a Citizen of India as per the Indian Constitution. They should not be debarred from casting  votes to the General Election to the House of  the people etc.
Unfortunately,  Article  6A (3) and 6A (4) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 have imposed certain conditions upon the Migrants who came to Assam on & after 1st January, 1966 and before 25th March, 1971 and subsequently registered as a Citizen of India by the competent Authority,   they are debarred  from  casting votes  for 10 years from the date of detection as a foreigners. These Clauses contradicts to the fundamental rights of a Citizen of India.
Article 6A(3) and 6A(4) are as follows :
“6A (3) Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (6) and (7), every persons of Indian Origin who –
a)       came to Assam on or after the1st day of January, 1966 but before 25th March, 1971 from the specified territory;  and
b)      has, since the date of his entry into Assam, been        ordinarily resident in Assam ; and
c)       has been detected to be a foreigner.
Shall register himself in accordance with the rules made by the Central Government in this behalf under section 18 with such authority (thereafter) in this sub-section referred to as the registering authority  as may be specified in such rules and his name is included in any electoral roll for any Assembly or Parliamentary Constituency in force on the date of such detection , his name shall be deleted therefrom. …………”
“6A(4) A person registered under sub-section (3) shall have     as from the date on which he has been detected to be a foreigner and till the expiry of a period of 10 years from that date , the same rights and obligations as a citizen of India (including the right to obtain   a passport under the passport Act, 1967 (15 of 1967) and the obligation connected therewith), shall not be entitled to have his name included in any electoral roll for any Assembly or Parliamentary Constituency at any time before the expiry of the said period of ten tears.”
23      Contemporaneous to ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950’ passed by the Parliament of India , the Prime Minister of India Pandit J. Nehru and the Prime Minister of Pakistan Md. Liaquat Ali signed a pact , Known  as Nehru – Liaquat  Pact on 8th April, 1950 thereby binding the two countries to protect their respective minorities and inter alia,  give them security in respect of  life, property , personal honour and culture. The pact also allowed freedom of migration of minorities and protection in transit without any cut off date. But the Govt. of Pakistan did not able to give protection to the minorities of their country and the minorities were subjected to religious persecution, time and again resulting huge number of migration from Pakistan to India. Although the Govt. of India assured the Migrants of Pakistan , that, they will take responsibility of the Migrants , but the fact was that , it was very difficult to tackle the situation for the newly independent  Govt. of India.  Therefore, the Govt. led by Pandit Nehru sent two Cabinet Ministers Sri C. C. Biswas and Sri A.K. Chanda to East Pakistan for restraining the minorities of East Pakistan, so that, they may not migrate  en masse  and to make them understand about the Nehru-Liaquat Pact --- the commitment of the Govt. of India towards the Migrants of  East Pakistan.
The minorities of East Pakistan believed in the assurances of the Govt. of India and tried to stay there.  Many of them are still living in Bangladesh. Some of them could not stay there for various reasons --- they flee East Bengal facing religious persecution or fear of such persecution and took refuge in India.    
After partition, both the India & Pakistan Govt. declared the opportunity to the Govt. Employees for  giving options, to which of the countries they are willing to serve. Naturally the enlighten sections of the society got the benefit of the option facility provided by the Govt., for migrating earlier. Some of the relevant portion of the Nehru – Liaquat Pact is as follows :-
 “A.  The Governments of India and Pakistan solemnly agree that each shall ensure to the minorities through out its territory complete equality of citizenship, irrespective of religion. A full sense of security in respect of life , culture, property and personal honour. Freedom of movement within each country and freedom of occupation, speech and worship subject to law and morality. Members of the minority shall have equal opportunity with members of the majority community to participate in the public life of their country, to hold political and other office, and to serve in their country’s civil and armed forces. Both Governments   declared these rights to be fundamental and undertake to enforce them effectively. The Prime Minister of India has drawn attention to the fact that these rights are guaranteed to all minorities of India by its constitution. The Prime Minister of Pakistan has pointed out that similar provisions exists in the objectives Resolution adopted by the constituent Assembly of Pakistan. It is the policy of both Governments that the enjoyment of these democratic rights shall be assured to all their nationals without distinction.
Both Governments wish to emphasize that the allegiance and loyalty of the minorities is to the state of which they are citizens. And that it is the Government of their own state that they should look for the redress of their grievances.
B.In respect of migration from East Bengal, West Bengal, Assam and Tripura, where communal disturbances have recently occurred, it is agreed between the two Governments:-
i) That there shall be freedom of movement and protection in transit
ii) That there shall be freedom to remove as much of his movable personal effects and household goods as a migrane may wish to take with him. Movable property shall include personal jewellery. The maximum cash allowed to each adult Migrant will be Rs. 150.00 and to each Migrant child Rs.75.00.”          
24      In the first week of January, 1964 , the Govt. of India took the decision to seal the India–East Pakistan border, so that, the Migrants of East Pakistan cannot enter into India. The total Bengali people of India raised voice against the decision of the Govt. of India. One historical convention was held in the University Institute Hall, Kolkata on 27th th January, 1964 protesting the Govt. of India’s border seal decision. In the convention, among many other distinguished personalities, Forward Block leader Hemanta Basu, RSP leader Tridip Chowdhury, Jana Sangha leader Haripada Bharati,  N, C. Chatterjee, CPI (M)  leader Jyoti Basu were present. The convention unanimously opposed the decision of sealing border and demanded for withdraw the same order. It was decided there that , those Migrants already have come to India and those will come to India in future from East Pakistan,  the Govt. of India have to take responsibility for their rehabilitation and to grant them Citizenship of India.
Next day of the convention, i.e. on 28th January, 1964, the then Central Ministers Mr. Guljarilal Nanda. Mr. T. T. Krisnamachari and Mr. Meher Chand Khanna, on behalf of the Govt. of India gave a joint statement  admitting the proposals of the convention.
Therefore, now, the Govt. of India cannot deny to grant  Citizenship,  rehabilitation and other such facilities to the migrated Hindus and other minorities of East Bengal on the simple ground that they  migrated  later on. The Govt. of India cannot define the forced Migrants of Indian Origin by law as ‘illegal migrants’ subjected  to harassment, arrest, detention & deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border.
25      Great philosopher, thinker and father of the Indian Constitution Dr. B. R. Ambedkar placed his proposal through his book ‘Pakistan or Partition of India’ in 1940s, in regard to solution of problems of the religious minorities, if, India is partitioned on religious basis. He wrote – if, ultimately partition of the country may not be avoided, then Hindu majority districts of Punjab and Bengal, should be included into India , so that, the minimum number of Hindus are compelled to stay in Pakistan against their will. He also proposed for total exchange of minority population, if possible, to maintain peace and harmony in both the countries. The policy of exchange of population was not adopted, but, due to severe riots in Punjab immediately after the declaration of partition in 1947, within a short time, almost all the Hindus and Sikhs of West Pakistan as well as the Muslims of East Punjab & near by areas,  were forced to migrate from their place of origin. Thus, the problems of the Migrants of the Western Part of the country are more or less solved.
In Eastern part of the country, no such severe communal riots break out during the period of partition. In East Pakistan,  for the first time, communal riots break out in 1950s and since then a series of riots occurred in East Pakistan and Bangladesh and all along communal tension exists in Bangladesh. As a result,  the migration of minorities of that country has become a continuous process. As and when riots start or communal tensions are increased in the country,  the minorities of that country are forced to flee Bangladesh to India. So, in the case of East Bengal -- the problems & plight of the unfortunate Migrants, the historical background  and the circumstances, should be considered sympathetically. But on the contrary, the Govt. of India have been treating them as enemies -- as illegal migrants. Their only crime, that, they have come to India later on!
Dr. Ambedkar was also very much anxious for the problems of the religious minorities,  who were living in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).  In 1951 he wrote in explanation of his resignation from the Nehru cabinet, that, ” there are two grounds which have disturbed our relation with Pakistan – one is Kashmir and the other is the condition of  our people in East Bengal. I felt that, we should be more deeply concerned with East Bengal where the condition of our people seems from all the news papers intolerable than with Kashmir.” (Ambedkar writtings & speeches, Volume 14, Part II, page no. 1322). The leaders of our country did not give proper attention to Dr. Ambedkar’s concerned in this regard and yet, it stands burning problem for the country and for the humanity.
26      On 28th July, 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the status of refugees adopted and declared some policies, which were effected from 22nd April, !954. Although India is not a signatory to the declaration, but India has been co-operating with the ’United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)   since long period.
The UNHCR has an office in New Delhi and they have been doing their job in India with the co-operation of the  Govt. of India. The Tibetian, Afgan & some other refugees have been given shelter in India. But the Migrants of Indian Origin i.e. the Migrants of Bangladesh have not been given the same status with the others. Some of the Migrants of Indian Origin are ‘Stateless people’ and the others, who came to India  after 25th March, 1971 have been declared as ‘illegal migrants’  are subjected to harassment , arrest, detention and deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border.
27      On 16th December, 1966 one amendment to the declaration on the United Nations Refugee Convention was passed, which is known as ‘1967 Protocol’. It removed the geographical and temporal limits of the 1951 convention and thus the convention relating to status of the refugees got Universal coverage. The Refugee Convention of the United Nations held in the year 1951 and for the first time, codified the definition of ‘Refugee’ based on the Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, which recognizes the rights of persons to seek asylum being persecuted in other countries.
According to the United Nations Refugee Convention, a refugee is “a person who  owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear , is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country,  or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it” (UN convention relating to the status of refugees, chapter 1 : general provisions, paragraph 2 of the Article 1 )
(Copy of the Article 1 of the UN convention relating to the status of refugees is annexed as ANNEXURE P / 2, Page No. 97)
28      India is a signatory to the United Nations ’Convention against Torture & other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment.  ‘ The United Nations General Assembly adopted the policy by resolution No. 39/46 dated the 10th  December,1984 and was enforced on & from 26th June, 1987. The Convention embodied the principles of ‘non-refoulment’, where it is clearly stated that :-
“No state party shall expel, return (refouler ) or extradite a person to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that, he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the state concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights” (Article 3 of the Convention against Torture….. document).
(Copy of the introductory note by the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is annexed as ANNEXURE P / 3 , Page No.101)     

29      Unfortunately, the Govt. of India has been treating the Migrants of Indian Origin in different ways. The Parliament of India has amended the Indian Citizenship Act. 1955 several times contrary to the Principle of the United Nations and against the law of Natural Justice. Particularly, the clauses 2(1)(b) and 3(1)(b),3(1) (c) of ‘The Citizenship  Act, 1955, are contradictory to the Principles of the United Nations.
For the first time, The Citizenship (Amendment)   Act, 1986 imposed certain conditions for having the rights of Citizenship by Birth.  With  the clauses  3(1)(c) of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ) Act, 2003’, the conditions  for achieving  rights of Citizenship by Birth were further  tighten  pushing the Migrants of Indian Origin in deep sea.  These clauses of the Act. are defective, because, if, India does not grant Indian Citizenship by Birth to the Migrants of Indian Origin  who have born in India, then naturally, they will be ‘Stateless’, which is not desirable and detrimental to the interest of India and for the nation as a whole.
The clauses 3(1)(a), 3(1)(b) & 3(1)(c)  of ‘The Citizenship Act. 1955 are as follows:-
“Citizenship by Birth --- (1) Except as provided in sub-section (2), every person born in India, ---
a)     On or after the 26th day of January, 1950 but before the 1st day of July, 1987’
b)    On or after the 1st day of July, 1987 but before the commencement of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ) Act. 2003 and either of whose parents is a citizen of India at the time of his birth,
c)     On or after the commencement of The Citizenship (Amendment ) Act. 2003, where –
i) Both of his parents are citizens of India, or
Ii)One of whose parents is a citizen of India and the other is not an illegal migrant at the time of his birth
Shall be a citizen of India by birth.”
30      The clause 2(1)(b) of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ) Act,2003’ has defined  the ‘illegal migrants’ as follows :-
“illegal migrant means a foreigner who has entered into India–
I)                  without a valid passport or other travel documents and such other document or authority as may be prescribed by or under any law in that behalf, or
ii)      with a valid  passport or other travel documents and such other document or authority as may be prescribed by or under any law in that behalf, but remains therein beyond the permitted period of time “


31      That  the original mended of Article 5 of the Constitution of India regarding Citizenship as made in Part II of the Constitution of India stated as follows :
“Article 5.  Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution ---    At the commencement of this constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India  and
a)     Who has born in the territory of India, or
b)    Either of whose parents was born in the territory of India, or
c)     who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
Shall be a citizen of India.
32      That original mended of Article 6 of   The Constitution of India regarding Citizenship as made in Part II of The Constitution of India stated as follows :
“Article 6      Rights of Citizenship of certain persons who have migrated to India from Pakistan ---  Notwithstanding anything in Article 5 , a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this constitution if ---
a)     he or either of his parents or any of his grand-parents born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 ( as originally enacted), and

i)   in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
Ii)   in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him trerefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government :
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.”
33      That original mended/mandate of Article 8 of  The Constitution of India regarding Citizenship as made in Part 2 of The Constitution of India stated as follows :

“Article 8,  Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian Origin residing outside India :  Notwithstanding anything in Article 5,  any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grand-parents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted ) and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as citizen of India by a diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor  to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India. “
34      That original mended of Article 11 of The Constitution of India regarding Citizenship as made in Part 2 of The Constitution of India stated as follows :
“Article 11 – Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law : Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters  relating to citizenship.”
35      That thereupon the petitioners also state and humbly submit before this Hon’ble Apex Court of India that overriding of the aforesaid Constitutional and Legal position and also overriding the original constitution mended  as  envisaged in Articles 5, 6 and 8 of the Constitution of India , Government of India made a cutoff date 25th March, 1971 for the Migrants of Indian Origin regarding  grant of Citizenship to them, vide a letter No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971, which is mentioned herein above in paragraph no. 9. Those Migrants were forced to flee East Bengal for religious persecution and fear of such persecution i.e. the Migrants of Hindu, Buddhist etc. communities are also debarred from granting Citizenship of India at the instruction of the said  Circular/Order.
36      That in view of the Govt. Of India order  No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November,1971,   Order of the Odisha Govt. No.  PPT(P)-60/ 2000-15681 dated the 16th March,2001 & the Order of the Govt. of India No. F-14011/55/09 dated the 23rd November, 2009 , the Govt. of various states have been dealing with the thousands of Migrants of Indian Origin from East Bengal,  who are victim of partition and religious persecution and are ordinarily residents in India for several decades to several years , as foreigners and the Foreigners Act, 1946  has been applying against  them  and they are subjected to harassment, arrest, detention and deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border on the gun point of BBG & BSF.
(Copy of the order of Odisha Govt. No. 15681, dated the 16th March, 2001 is annexed as ANNEXURE P/4,  Page No. 105 and Govt. of India, Home Ministry, order no. F-14011/55/09-F.VI, dated the 23rd November, 2009 is annexed as ANNEXURE P/5, Page No. 108 )
37      Those unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin were deported from Assam State to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border,   some of them are :Smt. Kamana Acharya of Goalpara district,  Smt. Parul Das & Sri Gauranga Das  of Darang district,  Sri Sisir Das of Nowgaon district,  Sri ramal Biswas of Morigaon district,  Smi Mihir Biswas of Paltan Bazar.
From Odisha, in a batch 21 Hindu Migrants were deported to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border.  Some of the unfortunate Migrants are : Sri Ashok Kharati & Sri Khokon Chowdhury of Navrangpur district,   Sri Anil Ch. Roy of Amarkote district,  Sri Anil Mistry of Raygarh district.
38      Thousands of warrants were issued under Foreigners Act, 1946 against Hindu Migrants of Indian Origin amongst them many were arrested and  confined to the detention camps/jails.
In West Bengal, those were arrested & sent to jail, some of them are:-   Sri Manoranjan Bapari & Sri Santosh Golder of Hoogly district,  Sri Ananth Debnath, Sri Madheb Mondal, Sri Radhika Ranjan Biswas &  Sri Manick Debnath of Nadia disdtict, Sri Sudhansu Biswas , Sri Harakanta Barui & Sri Keshablal Sana of Burdwan district,  Sri Kamal Saha ,Sri Bablu Saha & Sri Tusar Saha of West Midnapore district.
In Assam hundreds of Migrants of Indian Origin have been confined to detention camps. Some of them are : Sri Sukumar Sarkar, Smt. Kalyani Rani Chowdhury  & Sri Pran Krishna Debnath of  Kaprup district,  Sri Satyaban Das, Smt. Malati Das of Goalpara district,  Smt Malati Nath of Nowgaon district, Smt. Uma Biswas, Smt Sandharani Biswas , Sri Ganesh Dey & sri Balai Biswas of Lakhimper district,  Sri Amrita Das of Karbilong district,  Smt. Karuna Debnath of Tinsukia,  Sri Surendra Nath Debnath  & Sri Phanindra Mondal of Nalbari district.
39      In Odisha, notices were issued to the Migrants of Indian Origin ordering to quit India within 30 days from the service of those notices. The Migrants were not given any opportunity for self defence.  1551 such notices were served on 1551 Hindu Migrants , ordinarily  residents  in Mahakalpara Block of Kendrapara District, for more than 50 years. The notices are as follows :--
                        “Government of Orissa, Home Department
                                                              ORDER
                                                                    Dated, Bhubaneswar,the 28.12.2004
No. 54898  /PPT. In exercise of power conferred by clause (C) of Sub-Clause (2) of Section-3 of the Foreigners Act-1946 (Act No. 31 of 1946) read with Notification No. 413/56(1)(FI) dt. 19.4.1958 of the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, the State Government do hereby direct that Sasadhar Sarkar, son of Lalita, a Bangladeshi National at present residing in the district of Kendrapara should quit India  within 30 (thirty) days from the date of service of this order on him/her failing which steps will be taken to deport him/her from India.

                             Address :
                             Vill - Kharinashi                                   Sd/- 25.11.04                                               Tehsil Mahakalpara,                      Deputy Secretary to Govt.”
Dist - Kendrapara                                                                    
40    Notices also served on the Migrants of Indian Origin ordinarily residents of  Navrangpur District, Odisha. The notices are as follows :-
                                                “COLLECTORATE : NABARANGPER
                                                    JUDICIAL SECTION
                   No. 162/VII2/2005 Judl.                                    Date : 27.01.2005
                                                                        NOTICE
                   Sri Anil Chandra Roy
                   S/o. Narendra,Village : Dongrigoda
                   P.S. Umerkote,Dist. Nabarangpur

During enumeration of Bangladeshis staying in India, it has been found that, you have arrived from Bangladesh & staying in India from the year 1975. As per Govt. instructions, Bangladeshis who came to India after 16.12.1971 with valid documents or without valid documents but have stayed unauthorisedly should be deported immediately.
You are therefore directed to appear before the undersigned in his office room at Collectorate, Nabarangpur on 11.02.05 at 11.00 A.M. with all relevant documents in support of your stay for a detailed enquiry.
                                                                                         Sd/-
                                                                       Additional District Magistrate
                                                                      & Inquiring Office,Nabarangpur                                     
            41   That ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ) Bill, 2003’ was moved in the Rajya Sabha on 18th December, 2003 by the then Deputy Prime Minister of India and Home Minister Sri L. K. Advani. Participating in the debate on the Bill, Dr.Manmohan Singh,  Hon’ble Member of Parliament and Leader of the Opposition told,
“Madam, I would like to point out thing with regard to the treatment of refugees after the partition of our country, the minorities in countries like Bangladesh, have faced persecution, and it is our moral obligation, that, if circumstances force people, these unfortunate people, to seek refuge in our country, approach to grating citizenship to these unfortunate persons should be more liberal. I sincerely hope that the Hon’ble Deputy Prime Minister bears this in mind in charting out the future course of action with regard to the Citizenship Act.’’ (Uncorrected page No. 681).
42      That Sri Sankar Roychowdhury, independent Member of Parliament from West Bengal participated in the debate on ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ), Bill, 2003. He told :-
‘‘Madam, I would like to convey further what Dr. Manmohan Singh has spoken about refugees. And it is an issue I had taken up with the Hon’ble Deputy Prime Minister. From Bangladesh, we are getting a wide varieties of people who are entering into our country illegally, all of them. Some are economic migrants whom you see all over the country, be it Mumbai, Delhi or Calcutta. Some are infiltrators, terrorists. But a large number of them are religious minorities facing persecution, Chakmas, Hindus, Buddhists, many of them. I earnestly urge the government....... minorities fleeing Bangladesh for the fear of persecution should be given citizenship and should be treated in a supportive and kind manner’’. (Uncorrected page No. 682)
                                     
43      Only the two Members of the Parliament Participated in the debate on the Bill. In reply to the speeches /proposal / demand of the MPs , on behalf of the Govt.  Hon’ble Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Sri L.K. Advani declared in the house of the Parliament saying that :-
‘‘Madam, I have taken note of what the leader of the opposition and Sri Shankar Roy Chowdhury have said, and I am fully in agreement with the views that they have expressed. Very often, in the past, we have faced this kind of situation when we have adopted an approach of that kind. There were various kinds of allegations made that are making discrimination between this and that, which we do not propose to do. We always say that the person who has to flee because of religious persecution is a refugee, a bona fide refugee, and he cannot be regarded on par with the illegal immigrants who may have come for any reasons, even for economic reasons. If he is an illegal immigrant, he is an illegal immigrant. So, I take note of what has been said and endorse it.’’ (Uncorrected page No. 682)
44      That it was discussed  &  accepted in the Parliament , that, a special provision will be inserted into ‘The Citizenship (Amendment ), Bill, 2003’ before finalization of the Bill, so that, the Migrants of Indian Origin from the territory now included in Bangladesh and who were forced to flee Bangladesh facing persecution or fear of such persecution and took refuge in India i.e.  the ‘bona-fide’ refugees may be granted Citizenship of India . Unfortunately, no such special provisions were included In the said Act.,  in the light of the discussion, held in the House of the Parliament.
45      That the petitioners approached to many Members of Parliament of various Parties since enactment of  ’The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003’. As a result, many of the Members of the Parliament, both Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha, have written letters on various dates to the Prime Minister of India and Home Minister requesting them to initiate steps for granting Citizenship to those unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin. Such a letter of the Hon’ble Member of Parliament, Sri Ramdas Athawale (LS) is as follows :
                  

                   “To
The Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
South Block                                                               Date : 26.08.2004
New Delhi
Subject : Problems of the refugees from East Bengal
                   Respected Sir,
With regards, I want to state that, some refugee organizations and prominent personalities of West Bengal met me in the recent past and expressed their concern in regard to the amendment of the Citizenship Act. 2003, where no special provision has been inserted for the refugees of East Bengal who are displaced from their mother land due to partition of India and subsequent political disturbances.
Most of the refugees are down trodden, illiterate, poor, innocent and are not in a position to fulfill the conditions for being citizen of India as directed in the recent amendment, though the one crore displaced persons are real refugees from East Bengal and are entitled to be the citizen of India as declared by our National Leaders at the time of partition of India and signed pact.
If we see the problem from the eye of humanity, we cannot refuse them citizenship, as they have no root in East Bengal since long. In fact, the refugees are in this country for three generations.
Therefore, my humble request to you to reconsider the Citizenship Act, 1955 once again and one special provision to be framed in favour of the refugees from East Bengal, So that, they are recognized as the citizen of India.
                             With regards                                Sd/Ramdas Athawale
                                                                              Member of Parliament (LS)”
46      That the Hon’ble Member of Parliament (RS), Sri R. S. Gavai from Maharastra,  in a ‘Special Mention” on 7th December, 2004 demanded a special provision in ’The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003, so that, the Migrants of Bangladesh may be granted Citizenship of India. The  Special Mention stated as follows :
“The Citizenship Act’ 1955 was amended in last December’03. The Act. has described all the foreigners who have entered into India without a valid passport etc. as illegal migrants.
The minorities of Pakistan and Bangladesh are victims of partition of India. They were forced to come to India due to communal riots and communal tensions and naturally, it was not possible for them to collect passport etc. to come to India. As per the amendment of the said Act., the crore of refugees are also called ‘illegal migrants’ which is not justified.
In fact, during the time of partition, our National Leaders also made commitment to rehabilitate the refugees and now we cannot deny it.
Therefore, my appeal through this house to the Govt. of India is to make a special clause in the Citizenship Act in favour of the refugees, so that, they may get citizenship of India and get rehabilitated.
                   R. S. Gavai, Member of Parliament (RS)”             
47      In reply to the Special Mention in the Rajya Sabha by Sri Gavai, The Hon’ble Minister of Home Affairs  Mr.Shivraj Patil wrote the following letter :-
“DO No.27018/06/04-IC.I                      Date-10th January, 2005
                   Dear Sri Gavai,
Kindly refer to your notice over a matter of Urgent Public Importance (Special Mention) raised in the Rajya Sabha on 7th Dec.’04 regarding grant of Indian Citizenship to the refugees from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) who are in India.
                             2        The matter has been looked into. With the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003, a new clause 2(1)(b) has been inserted which defines ‘illegal migrants’. These illegal migrants are not eligible for Indian Citizenship.
                             3        However, I would like bring to your notice that a decision was taken earlier to grant citizenship to the refugees from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) who came to India before the cut off date of 25.03.71. Hence, the amendment to the Citizenship Act. has no bearing on granting citizenship to the refugees from East Pakistan who came to India at the time of partition.
                   With regards,                                               Sd/ Shivraj V. Patil
                                                                                    Minister of Home Affairs”.
48      That the Hon’ble Member of Parliament (LS) from Assam (BJP), Sri Kabindra Purkayautha demanded in the Parliament for granting Citizenship to the Hindu Migrants of Bangladesh, who have faced persecution in that country, on 19th December, 2011 as follows :
“Our country was partitioned on the basis to two nation theory. Muslim league demanded partition and got it. Hindus and other minority communities of Pakistan had to leave their ancestral homes being persecuted due to civil disturbance, looting, torturing and harassment and took shelter in India including Assam as the victims of Partition. As per the U.N.O. definition, they are refugees and deserve shelter, rehabilitation and citizenship observing formalities. This is not the case with the Bangladeshi Muslims. They have infiltrated particularly in Assam and other bordering States  with ulterior motives. So, both should not be treated at par. The Central Government and the State Government of Assam should make distinction between the two in providing facilities to the needy ones. The Bengali Hindus of East Pakistan (Present Bangladesh) who are the victims of the partition should not be subjected to severe harassment by making them as ‘D’ voters. Their voting right should not be ceased and those who have been sent to detention camp should be settled properly.
I demand that the refugees should be given Citizenship right as was done in the case of Hindus who came from West Pakistan and settled in Rajasthan and Gujarat. All sorts of harassment on the Bengali Hindus should be stopped”.
49      The Hon’ble Member of Parliament (LS) from West Bengal (CPI-M),  Sri Basudeb Acharia demanded in the Parliament for Citizenship to the Migrants of East Bengal  on 25th April, 2012 as follows :
“Mr. Chairman, Sir, I am raising an issue pertaining to lakhs of people who came as refugees to our country from erstwhile East Pakistan and Bangladesh because of their persecution as minorities.
These refugees have settled and are staying different parts of the country and in different States like Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh and Orissa. They are staying in these States for years together. In spite of staying here for many years, these refugees have not been granted citizenship in our country.

Sir, an assurance was given by no less a person than the Prime Minister himself that the granting of citizenship of these refugees would be considered favourably but the Central Government, till today, have not considered granting citizenship to lakhs of Bengali refugees.
Sir, when the Citizenship Act was brought before this House in 2003, and amendment was moved and that amendment was supported by all political parties. In spite of the support from the political spectrum of this House, the amendment was not accepted by the Government of grant citizenship to these hapless people. As a result of this, there are Namashudras  living in Uttar Pradesh, Chattisgarh and Uttarakhand, they are recognize as Scheduled Caste in the State of West Bengal but they are not recognized as Scheduled Caste in Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. I have already introduced a Private Member’s Bill in this regard … (Interruptions) 
MR. CHAIRMAN : That is another issue. Please speak about the refugees. SHRI BASU DEB ACHARIA (BANKURA) : Sir, it is the same issue pertaining to the refugees. They are belonging to the Namashudras who are recognized as Scheduled Castes in the State of West Bengal. Although the Government of Uttar Pradesh recommended them for inclusion under Scheduled Caste, that has not  been considered. The problem has been accentuated when these peoples are being excluded by other indentification. Now, uncertainty is prevailing in the country.

I demand that Citizenship Act should be suitably amended. Sub-Section 1(b) of Clause 2 of the Act should be amended accordingly to recognize and grant citizenship to the Bengali refugees who migrated from erstwhile Pakistan even before Indira-Mujib Agreement. They have been staying in the country for years together without having a right of citizenship. This uncertainty should be ended. The persecution of lakhs of Bengali refugees should be ended.
I demand the Citizenship Act should be amended to grant citizenship to these Bengali refugees.
MR. CHAIRMAN : Shri P.L. Punia and Shri Khagen Das are allowed to associate with the issue raised by Shri Basudeb Acharia”.
50      The Hon’ble Member of Parliament (RS) from West Bengal (CPI-M), Sri Shyamal Kr. Chakraborty demanded in the Parliament for Citizenship to the Migrants of East Bengal on 27th April, 2012 as follows :
                                               
                                  “CITIZENSHIP OF BANGLADESH REFUGEES
The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003 has declared all the foreigners who have entered into India without a valid passport etc., as illegal migrants. No cutoff date for the purpose is mentioned in the said Act, 2003, and naturally the cut off date becomes 19th July, 1948.
The minorities of the erstwhile East Pakistan were victims of partition and compelled to leave that country for the fear of persecution. A huge number of minorities of Bangladesh were forced to seek refuge in India. The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003 has declared lakhs of refugees as illegal migrants which is not justified. It is also to be noted that overwhelming majority of those people belong to the dalit community.
Considering the fact when the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003 was moved in the Rajya Sabha on 18th December, 2003 by the then Home Minister, Shri L.K. Advani, the then Leader of the opposition, Dr. Manmohan  Singh appealed for a special provision in the proposed Act, so that, the refugees who have come from Bangladesh may be granted citizenship of India, and the Hon. Home Minister agreed to that. but, unfortunately there has been no positive amendment of the clause.
Therefore, my appeal to the Hon. Prime Minister of India to convene  an all-party meeting to arrive at a consensus to pave the way for making a special clause in the Citizenship Act, 1955 in favour of those refugees, so that, they may be granted citizenship and proper rehabilitation.
SHRI PRASANTA CHATTERJEE (WEST BENGAL) : Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I associate myself with the Special Mention made by my colleague”.

51      No fees were levied from the persons of Indian Origin for application for Indian Citizenship u/s 5(1)(a) & 5(1)(d) as per the direction of the Clause No. 31(1) of the Citizenship Rules, 1956.  Now, fees of Rs.5000.00 for application  for Citizenship of India u/s  5(1)(a) & Rs.3000.00 for application  u/s  5(1)(d) have been fixed for the Indian Origin as per the direction of Clause 41 of the Citizenship Rules, 2009. Most of the migrants of Indian Origin from East Bengal are poor and BPL category and unable to pay the fees.
            Moreover, many applications for citizenship of India are pending with the Home Ministry for long time. Now, the govt. of India demanding fees at the rate prescribed in the Citizenship Rules, 2009  for those pending applications also, which is not justified. Letters of the Home Ministry to such pending applicants are as follows :-
                                                                                      “SPEED POST/REMINDER
                                                         No. 26013/1110/99-IC-III
                         GOVERNMENT OF INDIA / BHARAT SARKAR
                    MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS / GRIH MANTRALAYA
                                                                           NDCC-II Building, Jai Singh Road,
                                                   New Delhi-110001, Dated the 16th December,2014
           To,
The Secretary,
Govt. of Uttar Pradesh,
Home (Visa-2) Department,
Lucknow – 226001
Subject : Special Task Force to dispose of pending cases of Citizenship – Grant of Indian Citizenship by registration under section 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act. 1955 – case of Mr. Haran Mondal, B.D. National.
Sir,
            I am directed to refer to this Ministry’s letter of even number dated 27-1- 2000, and State Government’s letter No. 2281/T/6-V-2-99-60/T/99  dated 31-7-99, on the subject noted above  and to say that the required documents to process the case has not been received so far. 
i)                   The Original Renunciation Certificate
ii)                Bank Challanof Rs. 5000/-
iii)              Three coloured recent photographs (duly attested on the reverse by a Magistrate /Gazetted Officer)
iv)              Personal Particulars indicated in Form X and three specimen signature (or left thumb impression) of the applicant on a plain paper.
2.         The State Govt. is requested that the requisite information/documents may please be obtained from the applicant(s) and be sent to this Ministry for processing the case further within 30 days.
3.         This Ministry’s file number given above may invariably be cited in all future correspondence.
                                                                                                        Yours faithfully
                                                                                                          (M. R. Meena)
                                                                                                         Section Officer
Copy to : Mr. Haran Mondal, S/O Shri Ballabhpada Mondal
Vill : Gabhia Sehrai, PS : Madhotanda, Dist. : Pilibhit, UP.
With the request to forward the above documents to this Ministry through the State Govt. for further necessary action urgently.
                                                                                                             Sd/-
                                                                                               (M. R. Meena)
                                                                                               Section Officer”
Mr. Haran Mondal is a BPL category applicant. Total members of his family are 5. Per application fees for Citizenship is  Rs. 5000/-. Citizenship of India is needed for all of his family members. For that, he has to pay Rs. 25000/- which is not possible for such families. His application is pending with the Ministry for more than 15 years, when he applied no fees were required for such applications. Now the Ministry has wrote the letter mentioned herein above asking fees of Rs. 5000/-within a month, is not justified. Not only Mr. Mondal, most of the migrants of East Bengal are poor and under BPL category and unable to pay such big amount of fees for application for Citizenship.
  
52      The Govt. of India made ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2004 in their application to the states of Gujrat and Rajasthan’ (paragraph 3(2)(a), 3(2)(b) and 3(2)(1) to facilitate the process of granting Citizenship to the Hindu Migrants of West Pakistan. It was directed that those Pakistani Hindus migrated to India during the period of war with the Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 and amongst those Hindu Migrants  of West Pakistan ordinarily residing in the districts of Kutch, Patan, Banaskantha  & in Ahmedabad of Gujrat state and Badmer & Jaisalmer districts of Rajasthan , their registering authority shall be the  concerned District Collectors.  And those Hindu Migrants of West Pakistan ordinarily residents in other districts of the  two states , their registering authority shall be the Secretary, Home Department of the states for a specific period.  Many  Hindu  Migrants of West Pakistan were benefited by the Rules, for registering their names as a Citizen of India, but, no such facilities were provided to the Hindu Migrants of East Bengal. Thus, the Hindu Migrants of East Bengal also  were discriminated in this regard. It is to be noted that the war of 1971 was actually held in  the Eastern Part of the country.
53      In a judgment between the case National Human Rights Commission  VS  State of Arunachal Pradesh (AIR SC-1234), the Supreme Court of India directed the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh to protect the lives and liberty of the Chakmas , residing in the state and not to evict them from  their homes and shall not be denied domestic life and comfort therein.  Concerned District Collectors also directed to forward the applications for Citizenship  of the Chakmas  to the Central Govt. for consideration. The relevant portion of the judgment stated as follows :
“Paragraph 21. In view of the above. We allow this petition and direct the first and second respondents, by way of a writ of mandamus, as under –
(1)  the first respondent. the state of Arunachal Pradesh, shall ensure that the life and personal liberty of each and every chakma residing within the State shall be protected and any attempt to forcibly evict or drive them out of the State by organized groups, Such  as the AAPSU, shall be repealed, if necessary by requisitioning the service of paramilitary or police force, and if additional forces are considered necessary to carry out this direction, the first respondent will request the second respondent, the Union of India, to provide such additional force, and the second respondent shall provide such additional force as is necessary to protect the lives and liberty of the Chakmas;

(2) except in accordance with law, the Chakmas shall not be evicted from their homes and shall not be denied domestic life and comfort therein;
(3) the quit notices and ultimatums issued by the AAPSU and any other group which tantamount to threats to the life and liberty of each and every Chakma should dealt with by the first respondent in accordance with law;
(4) the application made for registration as citizen of India by the  Chakmas under Section 5 of the Act, shall be entered in the register maintained for the purpose and shall be forwarded by the Collector or the DC who receives them under the relevant rule, with without enquiry, as the case may be, to the Central Government for its consideration in accordance with law: even returned application shall be called back or fresh ones shall be obtained from the concerned persons and shall be processed and forwarded to the Central Government for consideration;
(5) while the application of any individual Chakma is pending consideration, the first respondent shall not evict or remove the concerned person from this occupation on the ground that he is not a citizen of India until the competent authority has taken a decision in the behalf; and

(6) the first respondent will pay to the petitioner cost of this petition which we quantify at Rs.10,000/- within six weeks from today by deporting the same in the office of the NHRC, New Delhi”.
Again the Supreme Court of India has given judgment on the case No. WP (Civil) – 510 of 2007 on 17th September, 2015 to grant Citizenship of India to the Chakma and Hajong migrants of East Bengal within three months from 1st September, 2015.
54      The Election Commission, Lucknow, issued an order No.140/E/10N,  dated the 3rd June, 2010  to  delete the names of the Migrants of East Pakistan who have been given  Rehabilitation Assistances/Settlement in the state of UP on the plea, that, they are not regular/registered Citizen of India. The Order of the Election Commission was issued in Hindu. The English translation of the order of the Election Commission is as follows :-
“ Office of the SDO Sadar, Electoral Registration Officer, 210, Bithur Bidhan Sabha, Letter No. 140/R. K. Election – 10, dated 03.06.2010
                                              
                                         ORDER
Lok Sabha Area provisional question No. 925 and Chief Election Officer, UP, Lucknow, Letter no. 6223/ CEO-4-2009 dated 27th November, 2009, reference - 210 Bithur Bidhan Sabha, Part No. 70 and 151 Bhouti Pratap Pur, Part No. 77, the names of 43 Bangladeshi migrant families  has been struck off  from the electoral roll. The said migrants were served with notice dated 16-01-2010 to that effect that they should produce their citizenship certificates by 21-01-2010, otherwise, their names from the electoral roll will be struck off. In reply to the said notices, none of the answering migrant could submit necessary papers i.e. citizenship certificate, except the papers of their rehabilitation at Bhouti Pratappur, District – Kanpur. They were settled in that place with the govt. order no. 343, dated 11.06.1976, was submitted by them. None of the migrated people could submit the birth certificate of their children that, they have born in India after 26th January, 1950 and before 1st July, 1987.
Migrants in question, whether they were born before 26th January, 1950 outside India or those born after 26th January, 1950 in India, but their parents are not the citizens of India. For the reason, u/s 3(2) of the Citizenship Act. 1955, none of the migrants are eligible for Indian Citizenship. They also have not been registered themselves as Indian Citizens by the President of India. The Chief Election Officer, Up, Lucknow issued direction to the observers and others, in a letter dated 01.01.2003, in  paragraph 7, page no. 4, for not to include their names in the electoral rolls those are not Citizens of India.
According to the legal position, no migrants of Bangladesh were granted Citizenship of India by the President of India and according to Citizenship Act, 1955, they did not obtain Citizenship of India and their names should not be in the electoral rolls.
Apart from these, there are various orders of the govt. exists, where clearly directed that, the migrants of Bangladesh are not to be  recognized as Indian Citizens, so, their names will not be included in the electoral rolls”.   
    
55      The Govt. of W.B. has issued guidelines for issuance of SC/ST certificate vide no. 1465-BCW/MR-67/10, dated the 30th April, 2010. In paragraph 9 of the order of the govt. five criteria have been made, required to be fulfilled for disposal of an application for SC/ST caste certificate. Amongst the five criteria,  2nd criteria is the proof of permanent resident of West Bengal since 1950. There is no relaxation for the migrated SC/ST people. It is an order of discrimination against the SC/ST migrants residing in West Bengal as nowhere in India, the migrants of ST/ST category are required to submit such proof for a caste certificate. In fact, the residential proof of prior to 1950, is asked for, as a proof of their Citizenship in that way. As most of the migrants from East Bengal have come to India after 1950, it is not possible for them to submit such kind of proof.
56      High Court of Delhi passed the Judgment in the case between Namgyal Dolkar VS Govt. of India ( WP-C 12179/2009) recognizing Dolkar, a Tibetian origin, as an Indian Citizen by Birth in accordance with ‘3(1)(a) of The Citizenship Act, 1955, since she born in India on or after 26th of January, 1950 but  before 1st July, 1987. The relevant portion of the judgment is as flollows :-
          “Paragraph 31 – The petitioner was born in India on 13th April, 1986, i.e. after 26th January, 1950 and before 1st July, 1987 and is an Indian by birth in term of section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act. She cannot therefore be denied a passport on the ground that she is not an Indian citizen in terms of section 6(2)(a)of the Citizenship Act.
          Paragraph  32 – For all the aforesaid reasons, the decision of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) communicated to the petitioner by the impugned letter dated 1st September, 2009 of the PRO is erroneous  and is hereby quashed. The petitioner’s prayer to be declared an Indian Citizen is allowed. The PRO will now process the WP (Civil) 12179 /2009, page 16 of 17 Petitioner’s application for issuance of a passport  once again and take a decision thereon in terms of this judgment within a period of eight weeks from today.
          Paragraph 33 – The Writ Petition is allowed in the above terms with costs of Rs. 5000/- which will be paid by the Respondent to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today.
                                         S. MURALIDHAR,J.      DECEMBER, 22, 2010.”    

57      The Supreme Court of India passed a historical judgment in the case between Sarvananda  Sonowal VS Union of India (AIR  SC-2920) in the year of 2005, where the  IM(DT) Act,1983 was  struck down declaring as ultra vires with the Constitution of India and upheld ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950 . For the judgment, as per the Clause 2 of the said 1950 Act, the Hindu & other religious minority Migrants of East Bengal in Assam/India are entitled to special protection/treatment in India . The relevant portion of the judgment stated as follows :
“Paragraph  57. To sum up our conclusions, the provisions of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act. 1983 are ultra vires the Constitution of India and are accordingly struck down. The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Rules, 1984 are also ultra vires and are struck down. As a result the Tribunals and the Appellate Tribunals constituted under the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act. 1983, shall cease to function. The Pass port (Entry into India)Act,1920, the Foreigners Act. 1946, the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act. 1950 and the Passport Act. 1967 shall apply to the State of Assam. All cases pending before the Tribunals under the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act. 1983 shall stand transferred to the Tribunals constituted under the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964 and shall be decided in the manner provided in the Foreigners Act. the rules made thereunder and the procedure prescribed under the Foreigners (tribunal) Order, 1964. In view of the finding that, the competent authority and the Screening Committee had no authority or jurisdiction to reject any proceedings initiated against and alleged illegal migrant, the order of rejection passed by such authorities  are declared to be void and non est in the eye of law. It will be open to the authorities of the Central Government or State Government to initiate fresh proceedings under the Foreigners Act against all such persons whose cases were not referred to the Tribunals constituted under the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983, the competent authority whether on account of the recommendation of the Screening Committee or any other reason whatsoever the appeals pending before the Appellate Tribunals shall be deemed to have abated”.
58      That the subject matter of the instant PIL, the petitioners came to knowledge in the month of July, 2015 through internet communication that similar PILs are pending  for adjudication before the Supreme Court of India, filed by ‘Swajan’ through Advocate Shuvodeep Roy and by ‘The Joint Action Committee for Bengali Refugees’ through Advocate Mrs. Sarla Chanda for effective  adjudication of the subject.
59      That the petitioners humbly submit that, the Migrants of East Bengal (both East Pakistan  & Bangladesh) are Indian Origin (as defined in the Govt. of India Act, 1935) and victim of partition. They   were forced to flee facing religious persecution in their place of residence and took refuge in India. They are ordinarily residents in India for several decades to several years, therefore, for the ends of justice, they should be granted Citizenship of India and be rehabilitated in India. They should not be called ‘illegal migrants’ and not to be subjected to harassment, arrest, detention and deportation. 
60      That on being aggrieved, the petitioners being Social Welfare Organizations and the public spirited persons have brought this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before this Hon’ble Apex Court of India by way of Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India on the following amongst others :---


61                                       GROUNDS
i)          Because the Migrants of Indian Origin (as defined in the Govt.  of India Act. 1935) are the victims of partition of India. They have faced religious persecution in their place of residence. They were forced to flee Pakistan and Bangladesh and took refuge in India. Therefore, as per Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, both the Migrants from West Pakistan and East Bengal, also those have migrated earlier and later on, should be treated equally in respect of grant of Citizenship of India and Rehabilitation  Assistance etc. in India.
ii)      Because the Migrants of West Pakistan who came to India around 1947 and who migrated to Assam  before 1st day of January,  1966, were recognized as full-fledged Citizen of India in regard to voting right, jobs of the govt. of India and other jobs issuance of passport etc. without fulfilling the ‘statutory requirements’, therefore, the same pattern of granting Citizenship  should be adopted in the case of the Migrants of East Bengal and Migrants of West Pakistan, who came to India later on, even after 25th March, 1971.
iii)     Because those persons of Indian Origin migrated before the 25th March, 1971, the Govt. of India has recognized them as displaced persons/refugees,  therefore, those Migrants of Indian Origin were forced to flee their place of residence for the same ground i.e. for religious persecution and fear of such persecution  after 25th March, 1971, should also be recognized as displaced persons / refugees, and not as ‘illegal migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act.
iv)     Because the national leaders of our country and the Govt. of India declared commitment to the minorities of  Pakistan (East & West), who are victim of partition to give them shelter and rehabilitation in India without any cutoff dateor any other conditions.
v)      Because the Nehru-Liaquat pact was signed to ensure security and safety to the minorities of Pakistan, so that, the minorities of Pakistan may not be tortured and compel them to migrate to India. But, the fact was that, the minorities of Pakistan and Bangladesh were subjected to religious persecution, communal riots etc. and were forced to flee that country.  The Govt. of India tried to restrain the minorities from migrating to India and at least delaying such migration by various ways, therefore, the Govt. of India cannot deny responsibility to the Migrants of Indian Origin on the simple ground, that, they have come later on.
vi)     Because the decision of the Govt. of India to impose the cutoff date 25th March, 1971 is baseless and unjust. The state character of Bangladesh was changed from ‘secularism’ to ‘Islam’ within few years of independence of the country and the minorities of the country,  particularly, the Hindus were subjected to similar harassment, torture and injustices , they used  to face in the Pakistan regime. Several times the matter has been discussed in the house of the Parliament of India, when Members of the Parliament have raised questions in regard to the plight of the minorities of that country and torture on them, on various dates. The Govt. of India  has  admitted, that, the religious minorities of Bangladesh are subjected to religious persecution. Govt. of India, Department of Home Affairs, very recently on 7th September, 2015 in a Press Information also has admitted that, the religious minorities of Bangladesh are subjected to religious persecution and has issued a Notification to give the Migrants shelter and not to treat them as ‘illegal migrants’ who have come to India on or before 31st December, 2014. The fact is that, the name ‘East Pakistan’ has been just changed to ‘Bangladesh’ ,nothing more than that, so, the 25th March, 1971, the birth day Bangladesh, does not carry any kind of significance to the minorities of Bangladesh, so that, a cut off date can be imposed to deprive of the Migrants of Bangladesh from granting Citizenship of India.
vii)    Because with the  clause 2 of ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act. 1950, the Parliament of India provided a special  protection to  the Migrants of Indian Origin, who were forced to migrate from Pakistan to India/Assam  for civil disturbances or fear of such disturbances i.e. the protection was provided mainly to  the Hindus and other religious minorities who faced religious persecution in that country,  which was again upheld by the Supreme Court of India in the judgement of the case between Sarvananda  Sonowal VS  Union of India (AIR SC-2920). The  clause 2 of the said Act. 1950, is the reflection of the declaration of the national leaders and the  Govt. of India during the period of independence of India and the Nehru-Liaquat pact. Thus, the Migrants of Indian Origin are entitled to favourable treatment in India and they cannot be stamped as ‘illegal migrants’ u/s 2(1)(b) of the ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003 as well as the Citizenship Act, 1955.
i)       Because ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003’was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 18th December, 2003, when the Hon’ble opposition leader Dr. Manmohan Singh and other MPs demanded a special provision for granting Citizenship of India to the Migrants of Bangladesh who have faced persecution in their place of residence and were forced to flee and seek refuge in India, in reply , on behalf of the Govt. of India , Hon’ble Deputy Prime Minister of India and Home Minister Sri L. K. Advani defined the unfortunate Migrants as ‘bona-fide refugees’ and agreed to insert such a special provision into the Bill, so that, the Migrants of Bangladesh may be granted Indian Citizenship.
ii)     Because the Foreigners Act. 1946 was enacted by the British on the context of 2nd world war to combat the enemies of India. The said  Act. may  not be applied to victimized the Migrants of Indian Origin. The Migrants are not at all criminal, they are victims of partition of India. They are loyal to India, they fought in the freedom struggle on India’s side and have been taking part to build up this country since long period.
iii)   Because the govt. of Odisha issued the 1551 notices and such other notices to the migrants of Hindu community to quit India within 30 days from the date of service of those notices without proper investigation and without the trial in the court of law. All the migrants are victim of partition of India and faced religious persecution in their place of residence and were forced to flee from the country and took refuge in India. They have not been given any opportunity for self defence. They have been living in the area of Mahakalpara Block of Kendrapara district for more than 60 years and in other districts also.
xi)    Because the original mended of the Constitution of India, part II, Article 5(a) & 5(b) provided unconditional rights of Citizenship by Birth to those, who or either of whose parents born in India. Some amendments were passed in the Citizenship Act, 1955 in the year of 1986 and 2003 by which certain conditions were imposed for achieving the rights of Citizenship of India by Birth. The children and grandchildren of the Migrants of Indian origin are the worst sufferers for those amendments. Since most of  their parents and grandparents  are victims of religious persecution  and were forced to cross the border in abnormal situations, at the time of riots etc. without passport-visa and thus, they could not registered themselves as Citizens of India by fulfilling the ‘statutory requirements’. For the reason, the children and grandchildren of such Migrants, who born in India, now, are not entitled to Indian Citizenship by Birth u/s 3(1)(b) and 3(1)(c)of the Citizenship Act of India. The Articles  3(1)(b) and 3(1)(c) are defective, because due to these Articles huge numbers of ‘stateless’ people will be created in India, which may cause harms to the country  and the nation as a whole.
xii)   Because the Article 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 provided the scope to the Foreigners to be Citizen of India by registering themselves, fulfilling ‘statutory requirements’ in this regard.  Overriding the said Article, the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, issued the order no. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971 directing all the State/UT governments for not granting Citizenship of India u/s 5(1)(a) to the Migrants of East Bengal.  Due to the unjust and illegal order of the Govt. of India, the Migrants of East Bengal had suffered for more than 40 years, they were deprived of from granting Citizenship of India. Now, their children and grandchildren, who have born in India , are also debarred from Citizenship by Birth on the plea that  their parents have not registered themselves as a Citizen of India. 
xiii)  Delhi High Court in a judgement on the case between Namgyal Dolkar VS Union of India and Karnataka High Court in a judgement between Tenzin Choephag  Ling Rinpoche VS Union of India, have directed that the petitioners, the Tibetian Origin, are Citizens of India by Birth, as they born in India on or after 26th January, 1950, but before the 1st day of July, 1987.  Unfortunately, the children of Indian Origin from East Bengal, who born in India after 1st day of July, 1987 were debarred from granting Citizenship of India by Birth on the ground that, their parents are not regular/registered Citizen of India. The parents could not register themselves due to the order of the Govt. No. 26011/16/71-10, mentioned herein above.                    
Article 2(1)(b) of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Act. 2003’ has defined the Migrants/foreigners as ‘illegal migrants’ who have entered into India without passport-visa and such any other legal travel documents etc. and debarred them from Citizenship of India. But, it is well known to all concerned, that, most of the partition victims were forced to migrate from Pakistan and Bangladesh for religious persecution or fear of such persecution at the time of riots or in such abnormal situations, therefore, it was not possible for the Migrants to collect passport-visa or such other travel documents to cross the border to come to India. Therefore, the Article 2(1)(b) of ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003’ should not be applicable to the Hindu & other religious minority Migrants of Pakistan and Bangladesh. Those Migrants should be exempted from the  Article 2(1)(b) by inserting therein a special provision, in the pattern of the clause 2 of ‘The Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950’ as they were compelled to leave their place of residence being tortured therein.
xiv)   Because the Govt. of India has been giving shelters to the refugees of various countries and co-operating with the officials of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). Tibatian, Chainese, Afgan, Burmese and refugees of various countries have come to India. They were not treated as ‘illegal migrants’ and the  ‘Foreigners Act,1946’ had not been applied on them. But, the Govt. of India have been treating the Migrants of Indian Origin, the victims of partition, the Hindus and other minorities of Pakistan & Bangladesh, who have faced religious persecution in those countries, as ‘illegal migrants’ subjected to harassment, arrest, under detention for indefinite period and deportation to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border on the gun point of the BBG & BSF, which is unjust and violation of the Articles  21 & 22(4)  of the constitution of India and principles/declaration of the United Nations as well as natural justice.    
xv)    Because the Refugee Convention of the United Nations held in the year of 1956, for the first time codified the definition of Refugee, which is mentioned herein above. In terms of the definition of the United Nations Refugee Convention, the Migrants of Pakistan and Bangladesh staying in India are certainly Refugees  and not ‘illegal migrants’. They deserve more favourable treatment in India than the Refugees of various other countries. Migrants of Indian Origin also should be granted Indian Citizenship. 
xvi)   Because India is a signatory to the United Nations ‘Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment’, held on 10th December, 1984 which was implemented on and from 26th June, 1987. The convention embodied the principles of ‘non-refoulement’, where it is clearly stated that, no state party shall expel, return (refouler) or extradite a person to another state, where there are substantial grounds of believing that, he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. In the light of the declaration of the United Nations, the Migrants of Pakistan and Bangladesh deserve shelter and other facilities in India and in no way can be harassed , tortured and they cannot be deported to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border or to  Pakistan and Bangladesh from where they were forced to flee for religious persecution and the migrants are unwilling to return back to their place of origin.
xvii)  Because there is no treaty/pact between India and Bangladesh for repatriation & rehabilitation of the Migrants. Bangladesh  also do not agree to accept the Migrants. In such a situation, deportation of the Migrants to the NO MAN’S land of the India-Bangladesh border on the gun point of BBG & BSF, not only violation of the United Nation’s declared principles in this regard, also violation of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violation of the principles  of humanity.
xviii) Because  the Govt. of Bangladesh do not agree to accept the Migrants who are staying in India. For the reason, various State/ UT Governments, particularly, the Assam State Govt. has been confining the Migrants of Indian Origin in Detention Camps without any specific order of the court of law, in regard to period of confinement. As a result the innocent Migrants, even the children & women are under indefinite detention for long time, far more period than 3 months. Thus the Govt. have been  violating the Article 22(4) of the constitution of India.
xix)   Because the Migrants of East Bengal who came to Assam on or after 1st day of July, 1986 and before 25th March, 1971 and who have been detected by the tribunal as foreigners and subsequently registered themselves as Indian Citizens u/s   5(1)(a), are debarred  from casting votes and some other rights of Citizens for 10 years from the date of such detection. This provision is unjust and discrimination amongst the Citizens of India and thus violation of the fundamental principles of the Constitution of India.
xx)    Because the list of D-Voters list were prepared by the Local Authorities simply based on doubt and being politically motivated.  It is now proved that more than 92 % of the D-Voters are genuine voters and Citizens of India.
xxi)   Because most of the migrated SC/ST people are unable to collect and submit  proofs  of residence in West Bengal/India since 1950, as a sizable numbers of the SC/ST families are landless having no deeds of land and most of them  migrated to India later on.  Many of those families used to move from one place to another places for their survival and for such other various reasons, thus, they have lost such papers if they had. Now they are unable to produce all  such documents as the proof of their residence/Citizenship.
xxii)  Because no fees were levied from the persons of Indian Origin for application for Indian Citizenship  u/s 5(1)(a) & 5(1)(d) as per the direction of the Clause No. 31(1) of the Citizenship Rules, 1956.  Now, fees of Rs.5000.00 for application  for Citizenship of India u/s  5(1)(a) & Rs.3000.00 for application  u/s  5(1)(d) have been fixed for the Indian Origin as per the direction of Clause 41 of the Citizenship Rules, 2009 (schedule IV). Most of the migrants of Indian Origin from East Bengal are poor and BPL category and unable to pay the fees at this high rates. Also the migrants of Indian origin are entitled to certain such privileges.    
xxiii) Because the facts and circumstances as narrated in the instant PIL, there are clear- cut violation of human Rights and thereby  Fundamental Rights as granted under the Articles 14,21,20(1) & 22(4) of the Constitution of India and the Rules/Principles of Natural Justice. The  group  of unfortunate Migrants of Indian Origin who are victim of partition of India, are entitled to get complete justice from this Hon.ble Apex Court of India and also therefore, for the ends of justice, which is necessitated in the facts and circumstances of the present case for interests of the public as well as interests of justice.
Therefore, the actions/inactions of the Respondents are, otherwise bad in law.                 
xxiv) That, the petition is bona-fide  and  petitioners have not filed any similar petition before this Hon’ble  Supreme Court as well as any other court of India.
                                                                 
                                                              PRAYERS                         
1          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents No. 1, 2 and other concerned Respondents to amend section 2(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act 1955, so as to exclude the migrants of Indian origin representing religious minorities from the definition of illegal migrants, as they are victims of partition of India and faced religious persecution           in their place of origin i.e. in Pakistan & in Bangladesh and were forced to flee those countries to India, pre & post 1971 periods. The Foreigners Act, 1946 and Passport (Entry into India) Act,1920 are also to be amended for the purpose, if necessary.
2          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No. 1, 2 and concerned other Respondents to declare all the Migrants, who were forced to flee Pakistan & Bangladesh, pre & post 1971 periods, for religious persecution & fear of such persecution and have been ordinarily residents in the territory of India, as Citizens of India in the pattern adopted for the Migrants of West Pakistan  around 1947 and who migrated to the state of Assam before 1st day of January, 1966.
3          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No. 1, 2 and concerned other Respondents to repeal the Express Letter of the Home Department, Govt. of India, No. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971, since the order overrides the directions of the Article  5(1)(a)  of  ‘The Citizenship Act, 1955 and also declare the decision of Cutoff date 25th March, 1971 as illegal.
4          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1, 2 and other concerned Respondents to exempt the persons of Indian Origin from levied fees for Citizenship Registration and direct, instead of Clause 41 &  Scheduled IV of the ‘The Citizenship Rules, 2009, to apply Clause No. 31(1) of ‘The Citizenship Rules, 1956’, where, Migrant of Indian Origin  were exempted from levied any such fees.
5          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 5 and other concerned Respondents to repeal the conception of ‘D’-Voters (D for doubtful) in Assam, as the  list of ‘D’ Voters has been prepared being politically motivated and simply based on doubts by the local authorities, which has prohibited lakhs of genuine Voters from rights to cast votes & also repeal the process of the trials of the ‘D’ Voters and detention orders. Also repeal the application of the Sub Section 4 of Article 6A of the ‘Citizenship Act,1955’, which prohibits the right to cast vote up to 10 years even after Registering as Indian Citizens.
6          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 8 and other concerned Respondents to repeal the 1551 notices issued on the Hindu Migrants residing in Mahakalpara Block of District Kendrapara, Odisha, by which the Migrants have been ordered to quit India without trials &  orders of the court and repeal  such other notices.
7          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing  the Respondent No. 5 and other concerned Respondents to enlist the names of both the pre & post 1971 Migrants of Indian Origin, in the Voters List and to Issue them Ration Cards, BPL Cards, Caste Certificates, Adhar Cards etc. & such other rights to those Migrants, who have faced religious persecution in Pakistan and in Bangladesh ---  their place of Origin and were forced to flee those country & took refuge in India.
8          Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No 7 and other concerned Respondents to repeal the Order of the Govt. of West Bengal No. 1465 BCW/MR-67/10 dated the 30th April, 2010, asking residential proof since 1950 as an evidence of Citizenship of India for issuing a Caste Certificate.  
9          Issue a Writ of Certiorari by commanding the Respondents to transmit all the relevant records of the instant case before this Hon’ble Apex Court for effective adjudication of the instant matters,  so that, conscionable justice may be done.
10       To pass such others or further orders as your Lordships may deem fit and proper.
AND YOUR PETITIONERS, AS IN DUTY BOUND, AHALL EVER PRAY.

Drawn by                                                           Filed by

Sri Naveen Kumar                          Dr. Kailash Chand
Advocate                          Advocate on record for the petitioners

Supreme Court

Drawn on ………………

Filed on………………….                                                                        

                                                          
                             





                               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                              CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                         WRIT  PETITION   NO.                                OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF :
1          Solidarity committee for Bengali Refugees                  Petitioners
            And Others.
                                                         VERSUS
1          The Union of India Others And Others                      Respondents                                                  
                                                           AFFIDAVIT
I, Sri Gour Chandra Biswas, S/o Late Rashik Lal Biswas, aged about 70 years, of Shanti Nagar, Palta, P.O. Nona Chandan Pukur, Dist. – North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, at present in New Delhi,do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :
1          That, I am the President, All India Namasudra Kalyan Parisad   and the petitioner no. 3 in the above matter and am well conversant with facts of the case and therefore competent to swear the present affidavit.
2          I say that the contents of the accompanying Writ Petition at page 1 to     , And paragraph 1 to 61, And synopsis, List of Dates at pages B to    , And  I.A. And  I say that the contents thereof are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
3          The annexures filed with the Writ Petition are true and correct copies of their respective originals.
                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                     DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this ……………., day of ……………….,2015 that the contents of the above affidavit are true to my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                       DEPONENT  
                                                              
                                     
                                   




                                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                     CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                                        I.A   NO                   OF 2015
                                                                 IN
                         WRIT  PETITION   NO.                                OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF :
1        Solidarity committee for Bengali Refugees
and Others                                                                                      Petitioners
                  VERSUS
1          The Union of India and Others                                               Respondents
                                                           
                                                  APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER OF STAY
To
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
And His Companion Justices of
The Supreme Court of India
New Delhi

                                  The humble petition of the petitioners above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH,
1          That the instant Writ Petition by way of PIL has been filed before this Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for the interest of group of unfortunate people of Indian Origin, who are victim of partition of India and faced religious persecution in their place of origin.
2          That the facts and circumstances of the instant Writ Petition by way of PIL have been stated in details in the said Writ Petition and therefore, for the brevity of the instant case, which are not to be repeated herein.
3          That the Election Commission of India has formulated and   implemented the conception of D-Voters only in the State of Assam, purely based on doubt by the local authorities. The list of D-Voters are prepared, being politically motivated and mostly genuine voters who are downtrodden, poor and illiterate, are included in the D-Voters list. Till date, those amongst the D-Voters have been placed before the tribunal for trial, only 7.4 % have been detected as foreigners. In the name of D-Voters, the genuine Citizens of India are subjected to harassment, arrest, detention and facing trials in the court of law. Lakhs of genuine voters are debarred from cast their votes.


4          That the Odisha Govt. issued 1551 notices on the Hindu     Migrants of East Bengal residing in Mahakalpara Block of District Kendrapara and such notices in Navrangpur District etc., directing the Migrants to quit India without trial in the court of law.  The notices are still in force and the said Migrants are debarred from various Rights of Citizen.
5          That the migrants of Indian origin were exempted from levied any fees for application for Citizenship of India. In the clause 31(1) of the Citizenship Rules, 1956 were given the direction for the exemption of fees. Considering the economic crisis of the migrants, the Rules were formulated. At present also, the migrants, particularly the migrants of East Bengal are not at all economically sound. Most of them are still under the BPL category and unable to pay such a big amount of fees for Citizenship Registration.
            The Citizenship Rules, 2009, in paragraph no. 41 (schedule IV) has directed to collect fees from the applicants of Indian origin also. It has fixed fees of Rs. 5000/- for application u/s 5(1)(a), Rs. 3000/- for application u/s 5(1)(d) etc. at a flat rate for all the applicants and no relaxation is given for the Indian origin, as was given earlier. Rate of fees is Rs. 5000/- per head, it means, five members are in a family, the family have to pay a total sum of Rs.25000/- for application for Citizenship of India, which is not possible for poor migrants of Indian origin.The decision of the govt. is not justified and gross injustice to the migrants of Indian origin.  
6          That the Govt. of West Bengal has issued an order No. 1465 BCW/MR-67/10 dated the 30th April, 2010, asking residential proof since 1950 as an evidence of Citizenship for which many of the SC/ST people are not getting the Caste Certificates.
7          That the Govt. of India, Home Department, issued the Express letter no. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971 on account of the situation of Bangladesh Liberation War, when lakhs of people of East Bengal, both Hindus, Muslims & others took shelter in India and expected that they will return back to their native places when the situation permits, directing all the State Governments/Union Territories for not granting Citizenship of India to those migrants u/s 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955.  Due to   above mentioned order of the Govt. of India, thousands of Migrants of East Bengal who have faced religious persecution in their place of residence in East Bengal for 44 years during the period from 1971 to 2015 and took refuge in India, have been suffering. They have not been granted Citizenship of India u/s 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The order of the Govt. was issued overriding the Article 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act. 1955.
   
8          That the petition is bona-fide and made for interest of justice as well as for the interest of public of those group of Indian origin, who are victim of partition and faced religious persecution in their place of original residence. 

                                                  PRAYERS
i )               Ad-interim orders directing the Respondents no 5 and other concerned Respondents for not deprived of the D-Voters from casting votes in the general election to the House of People etc. and not to arrest and detain the D-Voters and to stop placing D-Voters before the tribunal for trial, till the disposal of the instant Writ Petition.
Ii)              Ad-interim orders directing the Respondents no. 8 and other concerned Respondents for not to apply the Order of the Odisha Govt., Home Department, no 55215/PPT, dated the 28th December, 2004 and such other 1550 orders, till the disposal of the instant Writ Petition.
Iii)             Ad- interim orders directing the Respondents no. 1 and 2 and other concerned Respondents for not to levied any fees from the applicants of Indian origin for applications for Citizenship of India as per the clause no. 41, schedule IV of the Citizenship Rules 2009. Issue Order to implement the clause 31(1) of the Citizenship Rules 1956, where, directions were given for not to levied any fees from the applicants of Indian origin.  
Iv)             Ad-interim order directing the Respondents no 7 and other concerned Respondents for not to implement the order of the Govt. of West Bengal, Backward Classes Welfare Department, No. 1465 BCW/MR-67/10 dated the 30th April, 2010 till the disposal of the instant Writ Petition.
 v)        Ad-interim orders directing the Respondents no. 1 and 2 and other concerned Respondents for not to apply the Order of the Govt. of India, Home Department, no. 26011/16/71-10 dated the 29th November, 1971, till the disposal of the instant Writ Petition.
vi)            To pass such other or further order/orders as this Hon’ble Supreme Court may deem fit and proper.
AND YOUR PETITIONERS, AS IN DUTY BOUND, SHALL EVER PRAY.
                                                                                       
                                  Drawn by                                                    Filed by
                                
                                 Sri Naveen Kumar                                Dr. Kailash Chand.
                                 Advocate                                 Advocate on record for petitioners
                                 Supreme Court of India.
New Delhi
Dated the………………..






                                    
CIRCULAR, SECRET
                                      F. 14011/55/09-F.VI
                                      Government of India
                                   Ministry of Home Affairs
                                     (Foreigners Division)
                                                              New Delhi, the 23rd November, 2009.

To
(1) The Chief Secretaries of all State Governments    and Union Territories,
(2) Director General, Border Security Force, New Delhi.
Subject :    Procedure of deportation of Bangladeshi nationals –
                   Revised instructions regarding.

Sir / Madam,
I am directed to say that Bangladeshi nationals, who came to India illegally on or after 25th March, 1971 are treated as illegal immigrants. Bangladesh infiltrators and those overstaying unauthorisedly after the expiry of their visa are to be deported back to Bangladesh. Deportation of such Bangladeshi nationals is at present carried out in accordance with the procedure laid down in the instructions issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, vide  
                    


















2          Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam ( CRPC )
                        ( Regn. No. 2729/1995-96 )
House No. – 42, Beltala  P.O. – Khanapara Road
                        Guwahati – 781
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                               CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                                    WRIT  PETITION   NO.                                OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF :
1          Soldarity committee for Bengali Refugees              Petitioners
2          Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam ( CRPC )
3          All India Namasudra Kalyan Parisad
           4           Sri Nityananda Mallick, Practicing Advocate
                 
                 VERSUS
1          The Union of India & Others                                      Respondents                      
                                             AFFIDAVIT                        
I, Sri Sadhan Purkayastha, S/o Late Jatindra Nath Purkayastha, aged about 56 years, having office at Beltala Khanapara Road,  P.O. Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam - 781022, at present in New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :
1          That, I am the Secretary General, Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam, a registered Organization under Societies Registration Act of  the petitioner no. 2 in the above matter and am well conversant with facts of the case and therefore competent to swear the present affidavit.
2          I say that the contents of the accompanying Writ Petition at page 1 to 83, And paragraph 1 to 50, And synopsis, List of Dates at pages B to F, And  I.A. And  I say that the contents thereof are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
3          The annexures filed with the Writ Petition are true and correct copies of their respective originals.
                                                                                                                DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this ……………., day of ……………….,2015 that the contents of the above affidavit are true to my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
                                                                                                        DEPONENT  
                                    
                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                               CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                                    WRIT  PETITION   NO.                                OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF :
1          Solidarity committee for Bengali Refugees                  Petitioners
2          Citizens Rights Preservation Committee, Assam (CRPC)
3          All India Namasudra Kalyan Parisad
4          Sri Nityananda Mallick, Practicing Advocate
                                   VERSUS
1          The Union of India & Others                                        Respondents                 
                                             AFFIDAVIT                        
I, Sri Dipankar Mukherjee, S/O Late Manoj Mohan Mukherjee, 11/9, Kishan Garh, Flat No. P/6, 2nd Floor Basant Kunj, New Delhi – 110070, aged about 57 years, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :
1          That, I am the President of Solidarity Committee for Bengali Refugees, Petitioner no. 1, in the above matter and am well conversant with facts of the case and therefore competent to swear the present affidavit.
2          I say that the contents of the accompanying Writ Petition at page 1 to 83, And paragraph 1 to 50, And synopsis, List of Dates at pages B to F, And I.A.  And  I say that the contents thereof are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.
3          The annexures filed with the Writ Petition are true and correct copies of their respective originals.

 DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this ……………., day of ……………….,2015 that the contents of the above affidavit are true to my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

                                                                                                       DEPONENT